Marvel Looks To Be More Artistic On The Cheap

  • 8 Comments
 
Marvel Looks To Be More Artistic On The Cheap  

Kick-Ass may not have set box offices across America alight, but it may still be a pointer towards the future of superhero movies, and Marvel Studios may be the ones learning its lessons, according to a new report that surfaced recently. Think less “violence and swearing” and more “budget,” however.

CHUD’s Devin Faraci breaks the story today that Marvel is considering a new direction for their less well-known characters:

Marvel Studios is currently taking meetings with writers and directors to work on small scale movies based on some of their third tier characters. The movies would cost in the range of 20 to 40 million dollars (very small when we’re talking studio films) and would allow them to take risks with less obvious characters and with interesting talent.

Filmmakers are being offered their pick of characters whose names are only familiar to comic fans. Properties like Dr. Strange, Ka-Zar, Luke Cage, Dazzler and Power Pack are among the many that are being tossed around right now. And the attitude seems to be that Marvel is open to bringing any of their characters to the screen at the right price point.

No filmmakers are named from these meetings, but this is a smart move on behalf of Marvel and Disney, diversifying their risk if not their genre… Plus, now we can all play Dream Low Budget Superhero Movie Casting and I can try and convince everyone that Donald Glover from NBC’s Community would make an amazing Cloak in Cloak and Dagger.

  • kwaku

    How does thing like this seem to come so naturally to Marvel?

  • http://aaronpoehler.com Aaron Poehler

    “Thing” like what? Making cheap movies from lesser known characters?

  • http://cornerboxes.blogspot.com CaptainFur

    If I Dazzler: The Movie becomes real I might as well die of a nerdgasm of cosmic proportions.

  • Tony

    Donald as Cloak- YES!

    Double yes if they get Alison Brie in a blonde wig as Dagger. (Okay, that’s a pretty bad joke. Even for me.)

  • r

    This is a perfect chance to see a Heroes for Hire, Power Man/Iron Fist movie, set in the 1970s. Make this happen!

  • kwaku

    I meant “things” and I suppose the rest of my comment should have been “while it doesn’t for others, namely DC.”

  • Alex

    Maybe they should actually focus on their comics, like making their heroes actually do heroic things and actually finish their stories and actually have a Spider-man who isn’t a satanic selfish momma’s boy. Kill Aunt May again!

    Hey, they should bring back Ben Reilly! He’s the real guy!

  • Scavenger

    kwaku: Mainly because Marvel Studios, pre-Disney, is really just a very successful independent studio. Even Post-Disney, it’s still that largely (we haven’t had Disney pull the strings just yet).

    DC goes to Warner Bros. and it’s a big movie factory, so it’s not as nimble as Marvel. Plus, there’s some embeded execs at WB who control DC properties, who want the big budgets rather than the multi-movies.

    (If you look at the Pre-Marvel studio films, you had a range of films..Big Budget films like X-Men, Spider-Man..Mid budget like FF, lower budget like Ghost Rider or Blade.

    All of them were successful monywise. And that’s the big key…as long as it makes a profit, that’s what Hollywood looks for).