The Music Industry Is Suing The Porn Industry – No, Really

  • 7 Comments
 
The Music Industry Is Suing The Porn Industry – No, Really  

And the award for the most unexpected* lawsuit of the year goes to… the record industry versus the porn industry, over unauthorized use of songs to accompany porn videos online. But is it really just Fair Use?

The THR Esq. blog is reporting that a lawsuit has been filed by multiple record labels against porn production company RK Netmedia, who specialize in, in the words of the blog, “a particular brand of adult entertainment where adult ‘actors’ perform sexual acts at exclusive night clubs and private parties” – while well-known pop songs happen to play in the background, with damages being claimed somewhere in the region of tens of millions of dollars.

Marc Randazza, attorney for RK Netmedia, claims that the use of the songs is covered under Fair Use:

If you’re going to film in a live night club, you’re going to absorb some of the ambient sounds [and] hear what the DJ is playing, and if someone can tell me how to shoot at a nightclub and police out the music in the background, I’m all ears.

Complicating matters, however, is the record labels’ insistence that actors are encouraged to lipsync to the songs, and that videos are named after individual songs (Songs mentioned by name include “Sexyback” and “I Kissed A Girl” – Surprisingly, no mention of Pulp’s “This Is Hardcore”). Surely at that point, it stops being ambient noise and becomes part of the creative process?

(* – Or maybe I don’t watch enough porn to have expected it all along.)

  • http://aaronpoehler.com Aaron Poehler

    “if someone can tell me how to shoot at a nightclub and police out the music in the background, I’m all ears.”

    You secure your location ahead of time legitimately and ensure only music cleared for inclusion in the film is played during shooting. You know, like real filmmakers do.

  • Joe S. Walker

    I once wrote a script for a porn film. It called for a cast of four girls, On the day (singular) of shooting only two turned up and one of those couldn't act. This is how things are done in the business.

  • no use for a name

    Next, the music industry will sue you for humming songs.
    F*Ck these bastards already, LET them go bankrupt.
    The point of ASCAP fees is that the music being played attracts people to the product.
    Can you convince me that none of these videos would have been purchased if there was no music?
    This is nothing more then another straw for the vampires to try and suck the blood from someone else's money maker
    Are there legitimate charges for licensing fees? Yes.
    Is this it? ABSOLUTELY NOT.

  • http://twitter.com/FasterthanShaun Shaun Manning

    @ no use:

    “The Music Industry” (capitalized, ambiguous mega-giant) is an easy target, and they have been behind some ridiculous law suits. This, though, is not one of them. Copyright holders (and those with a legitimate interest in those copyrights, such as their publishers) have a right to determine how their material is used. If they forgo that right (such as a Creative Commons situation), that's one thing, but it's another for a person/business to deny it to them simply because respecting it is inconvenient.

  • demoncat_4

    this has got to be the stupidest law suit filed by the record companies for what do they want the porn makers to walk into a night club and have it be silent for music will be playing and the actors will no doubt lip sync the record industry is losing its mind going after the porn industry over music.

  • Mhalteman

    The record industry may indeed be losing its mind, but you have lost something far more precious: Your punctuation.

  • Rufus Firefly13

    ZING