How Much Comic-Con Is Too Much?

  • 24 Comments
 
How Much Comic-Con Is Too Much?  

Now that Comic-Con is slowly retreating into a large, monolithic entity in the memories of all who attended this year, it’s worth looking back and thinking: Was it all worth it?

Various, smarter, people have already done the math about how much companies attending Comic-Con International will have had to pay per attendee in order to really impact people’s consciousness, but even that seems like a shot in the dark to me – CBS’ booth, for example, was bigger than most, but I couldn’t tell you anything about any of their shows that were showing there – In comparison, AMC’s The Walking Dead booth was much smaller and, presumably, cheaper, but it grabbed your attention and got people talking (Similarly, the No Ordinary Family booth was tiny, but had people lining up all weekend to lift the hydraulically operated car and ogle the booth babes). My concern isn’t really anything to do with cost, but more – At what point does Comic-Con become complete overkill?

To put things in some kind of perspective, on the Thursday evening of Con, I saw Scott Pilgrim Versus The World; it was, genuinely, everything I had hoped it’d be – Not least of all because it was different enough from the books that it felt like a complete movie in and of itself, as much a movie that celebrates movies as the original books celebrate comics – but the euphoria from that experience was shortlived; within minutes of leaving the theaters, people were trying to grab me to go to the opening of Flynn’s Arcade that night, or to head to some party where some celebrity might’ve been showing up possibly. That’s what the entire con was like: every cool thing you saw was immediately followed by a hundred different things that wanted you to know that they could be just as cool if given the chance.

It’s easy to talk about the winners of Comic-Con – Those who managed to get people most excited about their comics, their movies or shows or whatever (For my money, Scott Pilgrim, Walking Dead and Tron Legacy were the biggest things there) – but what seems to missed in all that commentary is how arbitrary that genuinely ends up being. For all the money that is spent, what catches people’s attention is what catches people’s attention; something that cuts through all the noise and sticks in the brain, and that’s something so independent of money or even quality, that it almost becomes magical. With so much begging for your attention to Comic-Con, with so much potential to get lost amongst everything else, I can’t help but feel that the real value of going to Comic-Con isn’t to let people know about your work, but instead because it’s too embarrassing not to go, these days.

  • Clocktower

    Long ago i wanted to go to SDCC. but i decided after this year i'll pick a different convention. SDCC is not about the comics any more.

    Very little actual comic information came out from DC or marvel. Marvel is already deep into Heroic age and DC is a couple months into Brightest Day. There was No big bomb shell major annoucement.

    It's about movies and tv. How is Glee or Bones comic related?

  • Richjohnston

    And Galactus hate. Don't forget Galactus hats.

    Can I ask, who else has done monetary estimates per attendee? Cos I'd like to compare figures.

  • the Dude

    it all seemed a bit… smaller this year, didn't it? the booths, the costumes, just the general sense of it. Or at least that's the way it seemed Friday (the only day I was there).

    I think we just have to accept that this is Pop-Culture-fest now and actually has been for some time.

  • tada

    Clocktower – if you can make it, it's definately worth it at least once. It is the largest spectacle and the one where everyone pulls out all the stops. With everything going on, you wouldn't know there was a Glee or Bones panel going on. And days that aren't Saturday are the most fun to talk to creators – my favorite memory was strolling into the Bongo booth at 10 am on a Friday morning and chatting with Matt Groening for about five minutes! I bought a Simpson's episode guide book from the booth and he signed it to me and my wife, asked my favorite character (Homer), then drew a Homer head shot and signed it! Other highlights include chatting up Ed Brubaker at the Hilton bar and him saying, “If you like Sleeper, I've got some awesome stuff in coming up for Captain America” and the Wayans Brothers trying to hit on my wife!
    But, I also haven't been in five years, because Saturdya kills it. But do it at least once!

  • Batman

    Interesting perspective. My theory is this: Did you have fun? If so, how much did you have? If you didn't have fun, you tried too hard….

  • Evil_s2003

    Galactus hate?

  • Billwalko

    Ah, but in our digital age, nothing at Comic-Con is really “per attendee.” How many of the attendees report, tweet, share, facebook everything they've seen? And in past years, the show had an attitude of “nothing is taped” inside the panels, in an attempt to preserve the experience for attendees. In the past few years, they've caved to the larger studios and news outlets… allowing them to tape, share and spread the highlights on the panel on YouTube and their own sites (check out Warner Bros. site for tons of footage).

    I started attending the con five years ago, when 60,000 people showed up. You could still walk freely from place to place and room to room. No lines for anything. This past years, there was 137,000 attendees. Studios have harnessed the “geek elite” power and they know these evangelists will spread the word far and wide digitally.

    As far as what makes an impact, it all depends on what you are into. I didn't notice “Tron” at all, because I'm not a fan. But I was delighted to attend the “It's Always Sunny In Philadelphia” panel. And what does that show have to do with comics? Sadly, nothing. But “Comic-Con” has become a misnomer, because it's really a Pop Culture Con.

    I do have to say, the past two years, I have been asking myself, “Was it worth it?” On Friday, I spent 3 hours in line for one panel in Ballroom 20. And anything in Hall H (Green Lantern, Thor, etc.) is a pipe dream — you could end up waiting in line for hours and just not get in at all. And although comics have taken a backseat, the sketch craze is at a fever pitch – leading many artists to jack up (and sometimes double) their asking prices.

    I miss the Comic-Con of 4-5 years ago!

  • Josh

    I was thinking the same exact thing, man. Like they made it into this giant thing that all of pop culutre tries to shoe itself into because they think that all this group of comic fans can help make their property more popular by helping make it viral and what not. Like I can understand genre things (like sci-fi or horror movies) getting coverage and being there, but like you said Bones and Glee? What the hell is that?

  • lead_sharp

    Always wanted to go but the more I see the more I don't care, they should just call it movie con and have done. There may well be more comic stuff there than given credit but it's not selling me.

  • Roypar

    I'd like to chime in on this what does it have to do with comics, debate. Comic Books are NOT a genre. They are a medium. A medium that can encompass EVERY genre. In the 50's before the senate hearings nearly destroyed comic books, you had romance comics, horror, Sci-Fi, and YES teen books. Fan boys need to stop being elitist and horde the medium to only their likes. For years, we've been wanting girls to read comics, and now that they're starting to take an interest these “Fan Boys” keep whining, NOOOO, comics aren't about girly stuff, it's about cool gadgets, sci-fi, and fantasy with girls in skimpy costumes. Geez, some of you people really DO need to get out of your basements and realize that some girls really do have differing interests, AND they have every right to express them in that wonderful medium of comic books. Glee is a combination of Archie, Josie and the Pussycats, and Teen romance comics. It's what normal girls like and their tastes should be represented at the Con. MAYBE if the majority of comics weren't written and drawn by 40 year old men, there would be more books like Glee. Right now there are females who are starting to take an interest in comics and by letting them know that comics can be a wonderful outlet for them to express their creativity. By telling them that comics are only about said male interests, you're limiting and ghettotizing the potential for the medium.

  • John Lees

    Probably my big regret of Comic-Con this year was going to the panel for “Dexter” instead of “Scott Pilgrim VS The World”. Not that there's anything wrong with “Dexter”, the panel was fine. But the whole “Scott Pilgrim” experience – down to being taken to see the film and attend a live gig afterwards – sounds like it was the highlight of the Con.

  • John Lees

    On the flipside, the highlight for me was definitely “The Walking Dead”. The trailer looked amazing – October cannot come fast enough!

  • Dto2865

    My biggest point of contention is related to the Hollywood invasion, but not in the way one may not consider.

    Since 2000, it really has NOT been a “comic” con, per se. It's now a branding. Like, when you hear the name “Corvette” or “Mustang,” you know exactly what sort of car it is, even tho the current models do not really resemble the originals. To change the name would be like when Ford tried to replace the Mustang with the Probe back in the 80's.

    My biggest “complaint” about Comic-Con is just how out of hand the programming has become. Why are there panels devoted to stuff like “Glee,” “Royal Pains,” “White Collar,” “NCIS,” “NCIS: LA,” “Hawaii Five-O,” “Psych,” “Community,” “The Other Guys,” & “Castle” ?!
    NONE of those programs/films have ANYthing to do with any GENRE associated with comic-con! (Comics, animation, anime, sci-fi, fantasy, horror & video games)

    Granted, I like some of the programs that I just listed. But, they have NO PLACE being featured @ Comic-Con! I mean, what's next? Is Comic-Con going to host “American Idol” auditons? Or, maybe the announcement for the next batch of celebrities for “Dancing With The Stars” will be made during Comic-Con?!

    The Comic-Con organizers have really lost touch with what Comic-Con used to be about. All they are doing now is (literally) bending over backwards, being Hollywood's…uh…um…well, you-know-what-i-mean, right…?

    They're just happily smiling, accepting Hollywood's money…not realizing just how much it's corrupting the original intent of Comic-Con.

    If the Movie/TV series fits within the genre that Comic-Con professes to cover, then party on! Bring it! But, for cryin' out loud! Please do not include stuff like “Glee,” “Castle,” or “Hawaii Five-O” as part of Comic-Con just because they're either the current zeitgeist or feature actors/actresses who used to star in genre programs!

    i'm just sayin'…

  • ryan

    I agree with everything you stated. If not that, it would at least help to consolidate some of the programming. For example (and I've used this example before), there doesn't need to be a separate panel for each USA Network show- how about a 1-2 hour “Characters Welcome” panel that encompasses their original programming? Or instead of Summit Entertainment having 2 or 3 separate Hall H panels (which they had last week), why not give them one, like Warner Bros.?

    Honestly, I don't put all of the blame on CCI organizers, it would be hard for anyone to turn down all of the money Hollywood has to offer. However, all of the talk is about how to accommodate more: more space, more exhibitors, more attendees. At some point, they need to say no more.

  • SageShini

    Aren't you, y'know, not there? Every year I see a couple dozen panels to visit–but those are panels. No one ever talks about the show room floor, because that's not what people want to hear about. It's not about the comics? WTF. This year it was ALL about comics or comic-related properties.

    I know Glee made it, but who's talking about that? All I've heard about was the Avengers movie, the Avengers cartoon, Young Justice, the Iron Man anime, and looots of new comics coming out.

  • SageShini

    No one's saying girls aren't welcome. But what's THAT got to do with Glee not being welcome at the Comic-Con? YOU'RE saying that women have no business being interested in cool gadgets and sci-fi. (The women in skimpy costumes bit can go though.)

  • http://www.audiocomics.wordpress.com Audiocomics

    Honestly, I think Comic Con is what each attendee CHOOSES to make it. There is enough in that building from all walks of life to satisfy everyone. While the “Chuck” and “Big Bang Theory” panels were fun, I ultimately didn't go for TV and movies, I went for comics and voice-overs. I had a great chats with Stan and Hunter Freberg and Jerry Robinson. Little actual comic info from Marvel and DC? How about IDW announcing new “Rocketeer” stories and a complete Alex Raymond “Flash Gordon” project? How about all of the artists and writers in the Small Press area with new projects to share? How about the overall creative energy in that building that people got a real high off of? SDCC is still about comics if you make your trip about comics. If you make it all about getting into Hall H or Ballroom 20, then you are bound to be disgruntled.

    Lance Roger Axt
    The AudioComics Company

  • Walkerim

    they should change the name to pop-culture con.

  • http://kodychamberlain.com Kody Chamberlain

    I was set up in the Image Comics booth all week pimping SWEETS #1, and I had a fantastic Comic-Con. I was flooded by people all week long specifically interested in comics and meeting the Image Comics' creators. In fact, the Image booth was packed, non stop action all week long for every creator at our booth. One quick look around, and I could tell Rob Guillory, John Layman, Jason Howard, Ryan Ottley, Andy Kuhn, and Phil Hester had people swarming all week long.

    I'd say that comics have certainly been overshadowed in the press by movies and TV, but lets face it, the press NEVER cover comics anyway. If the film and TV stuff was pushed out of the convention, the media would simply loose interest all together.

    But the ATTENDEES still love comics and that's what it's all about. Lots of comic readers also love DEXTER, and that's cool with me. If it ever gets to the point where the attendees ignore comics in favor of TV, that's when I move on. But that hasn't happened. In fact, I'd say the attendees were swarming around the comic booths MORE than they were around the movie booths. I don't do many panels, so I can't speak on that subject, but our KICKSTART YOUR COMICS panel was packed, standing room only. People were eager to learn more about how we used the Kickstarter.com site to launch our comics and we were flooded with follow-up questions at our booth the following day. I wasn't at the Image Comics panel, but I'm told it was also standing room only.

    I think we, as industry professionals, can look at the 'spectacle' of Comic-Con as a true opportunity. I was able to get coverage on G4TV not once, but TWICE, I was on camera several times as the Spurlock documentary crew followed John Layman at our booth, and I also did an interview with the crew filming Comic-Con in 3D for a separate documentary. I did 2 or 3 podcasts a day for comic and non-comic audiences, and I was even interviewed by a Jonas brother. Yes, I know the Jonas Brothers aren't exactly what we'd consider our normal “comics audience,” but one of my main goals of Comic-Con is to reach out and EXPAND my audience.

    Mission accomplished.

    If we go into Comic-Con with an optimistic view and carefully plan our attack, a lot can be accomplished at that show. If you just sit around and complain about GLEE all week, you'll miss an amazing opportunity to reach an impressionable pop-culture-friendly audience that only comes around once a year.

  • John Siuntres

    Graham, I must disagree. After being away for 3 years I was pleased to see that despite the Hype machine that's behind so many of the big attractions of films and tv, there are still dozens of panels and events each day for hardcore comic fans. Yes getting around is harder, but that doesn't mean that there are unique comic book panels you only find at SDCC. I counted 220 hours of pure comics events (not including the tie-in films animation or TV) spread over the 4 days. From the master classes conducted by artists and writers, to retrospectives on comic history , sevearl “how to break in ” panels, discussions of golden age greats, comics in the classroom, indie spotlightgs of wonderful creators, interesting legal debates, 7 hrs of retailer tips, etc. SDCC is still very much about comics. It's up to the attendee to make comic-con into the experience they choose to make it.

  • Dto2865

    Ryan, Lance, Kody & John:
    Thank you for your input. You all have very excellent responses.
    Kody, I am glad to see that your company received a lot of interest. However, if you were to have been able to wander down towards the “smaller end” of the convention center (aisles #'d below 2000), you would have noticed just how little love we independent companies received, both from the general public & especially the media.
    Unless you're with one of the bigger companies (Marvel, DC, Image, Dark Horse, IDW), the Comic-Con PR department doesn't give a tinker's damn. They tell you that all media requests must go thru them. However, the Con PR dept. is all about Hollywood, so they ignore anyone who isn't connected. (I know this because I've been fighting this uphill battle for my company for several years)
    Ryan, I am in 100% agreement with you. However, you kind'a missed my point. I'd much rather NOT have any non-genre panels/events at Comic-Con. That is, unless they decide to possibly move them to one of the off-site facilities exclusively. Not only that, but how about they also move all of those Hollywood exhibitors off-site as well?
    By doing so, it would help to lighten the traffic load within the Convention Center. I mean, let's face it, folks, most of the people who're attending Comic-Con are there to star-gaze. They just want to catch a glimpse at their favorite celebrities.
    By segregating all of the Hollywood-related exhibits & panels, we can bring in more exhibitors/vendors into the center AND alleviate the crowd control issues.
    Oh, and I have forgotten to mention the best part? It would eliminate “Camp Twilight” !

    In a way, they're already sort'a doing that now. Or, did you not notice the “Battle: Los Angeles” real tank & helicopter display or the Green Hornet stage that were parked outside of the convention center?

  • DonP

    I've been attending Comic-Con for sixteen years, and my wife has attended the last six. I would have to say that of the last three Cons, the three “too-packed-to-be-enjoyable”, this one has been the best. I too was annoyed by proliferation of non-genre, non-comic related material, i.e. Psych, but let's be honest True Blood sponsored ninety percent of this years festivities. I miss the days of hitting up a panel in room 6AB then running over to a movie panel in ballroom 20 fifteen minutes late and still getting a good seat, (hell, I miss the thre days of the comic Expo before the Con proper started). But being popular is a good thing. Cross pollination is what Hollywood, Bollywood, Main Street, and whether we like it or not, Marvel and DC drool for. I love comics, but I sure as hell made sure I went to the Big Bang theory panel, not much of a stretch I grant you, but I sat throught the Stargate Universe panel and Caprica to get there. They may have snagged a new fan, they didn't but the theory holds true. We're not used to being the popular kid, that's cool, it'll take some time. I have had one of the best con experiences I have had since the late nineties. It's like life, you get what you put into it. Think like one of the major religions, hook the newbies with what they like, then sale them on what they don't know about.

  • kodychamberlain

    I can dig where you're coming from, but I've been in the trenches for a long time. I've been going to Comic-Con since 1994 and my early years were spent standing in 6 or 7 hour lines waiting to have a portfolio reviewed by editors, pimping small black and white anthology work, and trying to claw my way up through various smaller publishers.

    I've been on the slow climb for the better part of 17 years or so. So yeah, I know what that's about. But I've always found a way to get the most out of all the cons I visit.

    My reply about the action at the Image booth was only to point out that a very large volume of attendees are at the show to support comics, they still love comics. And without the movie stars being there, there would be zero media attention at that show. The movie and TV spectacle brings an opportunity to get national coverage, that's a fact. And I don't think it shouldn't be ignored or dismissed the way many people do. And no, I'm not saying it's easy, I'm just saying it's an opportunity that wouldn't exist otherwise.

  • roypar

    No, I'm not saying that women have no business being interested in cool gadgets and sci-fi. I'm saying that comic books are a medium and should not and are not simply confined to those stereotypical genres. Again, the argument from some people are, Battlestar Galactica, and other sci-fi shows are welcome at comic con because they deal with sci-fi. But comic books also deal with teen issues, social alienation, and celebrating one's individuality. As I stated, Glee has a lot in common with Archie and Josie and the Pussycats. And by highlighting those commonalities, you could expand the audience for comic books and allow for an influx for new creative titles that would reach out to audiences who don't read comics because they think the stories are only about said stereotypical genres. The Japanese have done it with their Manga titles, and look how popular they've become with teen girls. Also, comic books have always been a mirror to popular culture. Look at the list of shows that were once made into comic books: Adam-12, Happy Days, I Spy, Family Affair, Bonanza, The Hardy Boys. Whether you like the show or not, Glee become a pop cultural phenomenon. Comic Con's tag is “Celebrating the Popular Arts.” And comic books have been doing that since it's inception. It's a medium that both celebrates and creates popular culture. And that's why a show like Glee deserves to be at Comic Con.