Where Have All The Good Times Gone?

  • 56 Comments
 
Where Have All The Good Times Gone?  

Am I the only one who thinks that – Inception and Scott Pilgrim aside, this year has been weirdly devoid of interesting or uber-blockbuster movies? Is this the year of lull?

Perhaps it’s selective memory, but this summer’s big releases feel more memorable for their lack of impact than anything else; whether it was sequels like Iron Man 2 or Toy Story 3 (Let’s all try and pretend Shrek Forever After never happened, huh?), reboots like Robin Hood, The A-Team or adaptations like Prince of Persia, Jonah Hex or The Last Airbender, it feels as if we’ve been through a season of almost-rans and nearlys, instead of a more traditional summer of movies that, if nothing else, dazzle with special effects and have people excited at the prospect of seeing more. Even “original” movies like Knight and Day and Salt failed to set the box office alight. So, what happened?

Part of it, I think, is exhaustion; it feels as if we’re reaching the end of the superhero trend (Sorry, Marvel and DC), but no-one has quite worked out what the next big thing is going to be just yet – My bet? A return to alien invasion movies, as evidenced by Skyline, Battle: Los Angeles and in a sense Monsters; I blame District 9 – and so this summer’s offering has been lackluster and scattershot, without any momentum or sense of cohesion to the whole thing. Maybe we should’ve seen the signs when movies started dropping out of original summer dates for later in the year – The Green Hornet and then The Adjustment Bureau – but, yeah: This is the year that Hollywood seemed to run out of not only ideas, but enthusiasm to try and convince us otherwise.

The thing is, I can’t work out if this is just Hollywood’s problem; the upcoming television season seems, for the most part, as devoid of The New or The Interesting as this summer’s movies; shows like The Event or No Ordinary Family feel familiar already, with even shows debuting next year – Falling Skies, the new Spielberg show in particular – feeling very similar to things we’ve seen in the past. Are we at a stage in whatever pop culture cycle we’re in where we shouldn’t expect a rush of original or polished ideas from anyone other than the most trusted sources (Christopher Nolan, JJ Abrams… Who else?) – and if so, what can be done to break out of it?

Or do we even need to? Is this the classic break-up situation, where it’s not pop culture, but me? Tell me in the comments: Do you agree that we’re in a particularly flat period of mainstream movies and television, or am I just cynical and jaded?

  • WeaponX

    I agree with Wha'eva's comment. This article is purely opinion. It's probably a minority opinion at that. How can you put 'Scott Pilgrim' in a sentence that talks about “uber-blockbusters”? You mentioned that 'Salt' failed to set the box alight? I agree that it wasn't a runaway hit, but the movie has made almost $110 Million to date and Scott Pilgrim won't even come close to half that when its run is finished. Then you go off and say that the “we’re reaching the end of the superhero trend”? Is that why we have X-Men: First Class, Thor, Captain America, Green Lantern (and its sequel), the Avengers, and another Batman in production? Studios wouldn't be investing hundreds of millions of dollars in superhero movies if fan interest is weakening. You also can't use the Green Hornet to back up your opinion. Yes, that movies is being moved back of because of the negative buzz it carries but that's more about the actor (Seth Rogen in an action role is a big mistake) and not the property itself. So just because Seth Rogen in a lead action role caused Sony to push the film back doesn't mean studios are giving up/backing off comic book movies.

  • Brian from Canada

    Not cynical or jaded — just TOTALLY not getting it.

    Blockbuster cinema requires getting the most profit out of the shortest window because of the level of competition. In order to get the most profit, you need the most ticket sales. And to get the most ticket sales, you offer people something that they want vs something that they don't know — because most times out of 10, people will choose what's safest.

    Iron Man 2, Robin Hood, A-Team, Scott Pilgrim, Toy Story 3, etc. are all “safe” choices. We know the characters, we know the basic concept, and if we don't then we've heard about it.

    Even Salt, Inception and The Expendables are safe choices: Salt is the latest Angelina Jolie action flick a la Wanted and Tomb Raider using the basic plot of deception we've already seen; Inception promoted itself totally on being by the guy who did Memento — a trick flick — and the dark Dark Knight, starring the guy from that other shocker Shutter Island; and The Expendables are all action stars doing what action stars do.

    So your basic conception that there SHOULD be originality falls totally on its ass. That's what Oscar season is for, in December.

    As for the quality of movies that made it out this summer, that's a different thing. THAT has to do with Hollywood hype and bought off critics (of which most of them are) who laud over films that just aren't worth more than a simple video rental. Or, they do the Dark Knight thing and read sooooo much into it that you have to wonder if you're actually seeing the right film. And since it's become all about performance at the box office rather than performance with audiences, every time one doesn't reach the imaginary goal then it's considered a “bomb.”

    Dark Knight made huge numbers, Avatar made huge numbers, and now they're looking to make the next big numbers film without realizing that a middle-level film will last longer.

    Case in point one: last year, Transformers 2 was declared best film of the year based on ticket sales, but by Christmas the best film had become Star Trek because critics were realizing that the comments on Transformers 2 were generally becoming negative in retrospect.

    Case in point two: any Oscar winner over the last 20 years, which has most of the time been forgotten compared to other films released that same year.

    Moving a movie date to an off-season period — like Green Hornet into January — may carry negative connotations, but it also suggests that the summer numbers expected aren't even remotely possible for this movie, which will do better compared to lower expectations. Machete is coming out in September, but I expect it will be just as enjoyable as any other time in the year and so will any of the other movies I choose to give my hard-earned cash for.

    As for TV, don't forget as well that advertisers prefer the safe over the original most of the time because it has a better expectation of numbers, and you're investing big dollars you can't get back. Would you spend $100,000 on an ad campaign during #1 show NCIS or #250 reality show? Who's going to get more people seeing the ad and knowing your product??

    Where the key is lies in HOW you take the concept and go with it. Capes is already open about not wanting to repeat the same mistakes Heroes made. Castle is a remake of a British series and going off in its own direction. Even Stargate: Universe, third series in the franchise, has its own distinct presence on television compared to the other series on SyFy and the other Stargates.

    Movies are made to be enjoyed. If you enjoyed it, it's not disappointing. If you didn't, ask yourself what you were expecting out of it and you may find your answer as to why you think it sucked.

  • Brian from Canada

    By the way, just in case someone was wondering, I didn't think Inception was great as a story (cool effects though!), but thought that this summer had some very entertaining films like The Expendables, A-Team, Iron Man 2 (though there were structural problems forced on it by not knowing what Avengers would do), Scott Pilgrim and Twilight: Eclipse (which was much better than I ever expected).

    And for a blogger who seems to care about film, why not mention this summer's BIGGEST stinker of all, Sex & The City 2? Saying it's amazing they made something so bad is giving it the best praise possible. :-|

  • BlueSpider

    This article seems to yearn for the 'glory days' of summer blockbusters, but really, when the f**k where those days? Please tell me because I can't remember 'em…

    Yeah, every now and then you get a behemoth movie like Terminator 2, Jurrasic Park, the first Matrix, blah blah – but one 'actually decent' blockbuster per year is more than I've ever expected from Hollywood since I was a teenager

  • Sylar Wesker

    How about putting the summer movies…in the summer, not april or may

  • noiamspartacus

    I just realized this is the first year I've been enjoying television more than Hollywood. Breaking Bad, Dexter, Fringe, Survivors (on BBC), Justified, True Blood and Spartacus (admittedly, the last two are campy, but great fun and audacious) all have better acting and plots than any of the summer movies. And Walking Dead on AMC in October!