Where Is The Big Budget D&D Movie?

  • 60 Comments
 
Where Is The Big Budget D&D Movie?  

With all the news about The Hobbit movie and movies based on fairytales being announced left, right and center, I have one very simple question to ask the collective minds of Hollywood: Why isn’t there a massive Dungeons & Dragons movie being made at this very minute?

First off, let’s get this out the way: I know that there was a Dungeons & Dragons movie back in 2000, and that it (a) wasn’t a hit, and more importantly, (b) wasn’t very good. What I want isn’t a sequel to that, however. No, what I want is something that takes full advantage of the strange and surreal place that Dungeons & Dragons occupies in pop culture. Think about it: It’s got the brand name awareness of mega-hits like Transformers and GI Joe – oh, and like those franchises, it also had a fondly-remembered-if-not-exactly-great animated series back in the 1980s (Uni!) – as well as the toyetic value of both properties. It’s got the subculture of a Twilight or Star Trek down pat, as well – Imagine the merchandising opportunities! – and, most importantly, it’s got the potential for the epic fantasy storytelling of a Lord of The Rings or Avatar already built in, without the need for all-new world-building on the part of the moviemakers. So… why isn’t someone making this happen already?

At its core, I guess it has to be a mix of rights and shyness after the failure of the last movie. After all, there’s no way that someone somewhere doesn’t want to be making this movie even as you read these words – I just finished the (surprisingly enjoyable) Dungeons & Dragons #1 from IDW, and it’s written by Transformers screenwriter and Leverage creator John Rogers, so it’s not like there’s no-one out there who gets the culture or backstory – so there must, I assume, be some reason it’s not happening that’s related to whoever holds the movie rights. Does New Line still hold the rights after the 2000 movie (Apparently not, as they don’t seem to be involved in this little-known 2005 sequel)? And if not, who does? Surely it can’t be that owner Hasbro – the same company that owns those Transformers and GI Joe franchises, and which also has a movie production company of its own – is afraid of making a movie out of it.

It’s just perplexing. You’d think that with the dual hungers for nostalgic/instant-name-recognition properties as well as fantasy features (as evidenced by the new Fairy Tale Fad that Hollywood seems to be getting swept up in), a D&D movie would be so much more of a no-brainer than, say, Battleship or Stretch Armstrong… So why isn’t it happening?

  • Nightfall

    Popular should also mean better. I mean look at Lost. While people couldn’t follow it at times, it was still better than survivor. :P

  • Thad

    “a cheap horrorshow of how to not make a film”

    Indeed. There’s some perfectly good voice work, but the CG Draconians against the cel everybody-else are incredibly jarring, key details (kender are immune to fear, Raistlin sees people aging when he looks at them, Dragons are considered myth and merely looking at one is enough to root you to the spot with fear) are completely omitted, and the “DEFEAT THE BAD GUY WITH YOUR FAITH IN GOD!” climax makes Narnia look downright subtle.

  • Trynn23

    My opinion is that a movie is based on characters in settings that test them and Dungeons and Dragons has no name characters it is associated with. You would have to create them from scratch which is basically like a real D&D game except the general audience would now know that and Hollywood has gotten very lazy when it comes to creating new ideas from scratch thus no D&D movie.

  • Philo Pharynx

    Personally I’d go with an Eberron movie. I’d have the opener (and teaser trailer) covering the Race of Eight Winds in Sharn. It would be a big spectacle to get people excited and it would show that this isn’t your father’s oldsmobile. Er… fantasy movie. They could adapt some of the Eberron novels or start with a fresh story.

  • Brian from Canada

    The pundits have all answered correctly. Fantasy films DON’T sell, and never have, with the one exception of Lord Of The Rings — which was not only a well respected tome, but a cultural fad in the 60s (from which Led Zeppelin took lyrics), a cartoon following the successful adaptation of The Hobbit… and for some, just a life style.

    I mean, seriously, how many people didn’t have someone saying the words along with the movie in the theatre, or making bad comments in Elfish?

    More importantly, there is no text to base it on. Criticized for dropping key elements or getting stuff wrong, people who didn’t read the books still knew there was a book out there that it’s based on. D&D doesn’t have that; it has guide books.

    Marvel actually added classes to make the cartoon more interesting, a point you can tell by the fact that they showed up in Dragon magazine at the time and not the rules. They went their own way and it worked within the logic of the series, but as a film trilogy it wouldn’t work because there’s no arc structure already set up for how to do films 1, 2 and 3 beyond the beginning and the end. (And yes, there was an end, it was just never put to film but it’s on the DVDs.)

    If someone wants to do a big budget movie, they can capitalize on the name and its difference to the past two films by saying that they went back to the core of what makes D&D work without the bad script. But they need a story to sell it — and no one in Hollywood at this point looks willing to throw $100 million on a film that has no workable story, no character archtypes well known in the general audience, and trilogy structure.

  • Apple_gate

    There is a D&D movie being shot at the moment. ‘The Book of Vile Darkness’

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1733125/

  • Apple_gate

    There is a D&D movie being shot at the moment. ‘The Book of Vile Darkness’

    http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1733125/

  • Lycan Sejemaset

    Well half my football team played magic: the gathering, and dnd…… so i think half the football team being nerds is a fair statement

  • xwozx

    Personaly i would prefer a live action tv show as a sequel to the original tv series, set a few years after the end of it to be exact. I n my spare time ive even wrote part of my idea up, but alas i lack what makes most people sucessfull, time, money and contacts :S

  • xwozx

    being a fan of d&d is just like being a football fan, you like something, you follow it simple. Stereotypes are dying out, get with the times