Undercovers Insider: We’re To Blame For Cancellation

  • 10 Comments
 
<i>Undercovers</i> Insider: We’re To Blame For Cancellation  

Well, this is surprising. Before the dust has even settled on yesterday’s cancellation of the JJ Abrams-produced spy series Undercovers, word is leaking out that Bad Robot is falling on the sword for its failure.

An anonymous insider on the show told Deadline,

Many things [went wrong with the show]. Mostly, what was meant to be a throwback lark of a show felt trivial to people. It felt flimsy and not compelling, partially because it was designed as a stand alone, non serialized show. Perhaps the stories lacked deeper interest and urgency. We tried to embrace a familiarity of form, but the public obviously didn’t want something so familiar. Unfortunately we never got an audience from the get-go; our abysmal recent rating wasn’t even one point lower than our premiere number. We just should have done better. It is a bummer to be sure.

Maybe most surprisingly of all is the lack of blame the insider had for NBC, which had massively promoted the show both before and after its launch:

NBC did the best they know how. We feel responsible for the failure, though. But damn, it sure would be easier to blame the network!

Does this mean that non-serialized shows – said to be the next big thing after the end of Lost – are back off the menu at Bad Robot? And, if so, will other producers follow?

  • Rich

    I agree with this unnamed source re: the show feeling “flimsy.” The format has been done to death, and I didn’t enjoy the interaction between the lead characters. Too much flirty banter to take dangerous situations seriously, and not much chemistry among the leads.

  • http://goodcomics.comicbookresources.com Bill Reed

    If it was on USA it would have been a basic cable hit.

  • Jaiee6

    undercovers fans tell NBC how you feel by helping sign the petition http://www.petitiononline.com/Undr9078/petition.html spread the word

  • nik

    Show reminded me of a modern Hart to Hart. And while I liked Hart to Hart when I was five, does that mean I’d like it when I’m thirty? Guess not.

  • Dtwinslow

    But I never thought it looked good. Husband and wife spies? Been done. Cast I have never seen before? Don’t care. From JJ Abrams? That turned me off the most.

  • Mike

    Let the show die. Good riddance.

  • stealthwise

    I had honestly never heard of this show before…

  • Ken

    I think it’s unfortunate that such a fresh, fun new television series has received the axe so quickly. I enjoyed this show thoroughly each and every week and I agree with what Bill Reed said; if this was on cable, it would’ve been a hit. On network television, though, not so much. Network television viewers are too caught up in Dancing With the Stars, Survivor, American Idol and various other talentless garbage that they’re not willing to actually sit down and support a GOOD new TV series.

  • c-fo

    So much talent wasted by a weak writing team. It was like watching two different shows, where ppl who were kidnapped and busted out of a dingy foriegn prison while dodging bullets could then just be this well-adjusted trend setting couple. It just didn’t gel. The actors were quite good, but the material was just too damn fluffy.
    Shame. When was the last time we saw a tv show with two black leads?

  • Pjd

    What a shame to cancel this show. The people are beautiful to look at and they have great chemistry. Let us hope the series can move to USA or TNT. NBC has very little worth while to watch.