In Defense Of The New Buffy

  • 92 Comments
 
In Defense Of The New Buffy  

This week’s announcement of a new Buffy The Vampire Slayer movie without Joss Whedon may have set the internet aflame in upset, but… Is it wrong that I think it might be a good idea? Please don’t kill me.

I should start, I guess, by owning up to my own Whedon fandom: I liked the original Buffy movie, and was a massive fan of the TV series. Angel kind of passed me by until the third season – I tuned in occasionally, but it didn’t really gel for me – and pretty much missed Firefly until reruns, at which point I fell in love with it (Serenity, too). Dr. Horrible’s Sing-Along Blog was pretty great, but I tend to think of Dollhouse as a misstep that may have been interesting, but certainly wasn’t good. Does that mean that I am a hater? I can’t quite tell, to be honest, because I’m certainly cautious about the idea of a Whedon Avengers movie and find myself hoping for the best for this Whedon-less Buffy.

Here’s the thing: This new Buffy feels like, at the very worst, an easily-ignorable addition to the franchise. It doesn’t mean that Joss has been robbed of doing more Buffy; unless I’ve missed something somewhere, he’ll still be involved with the Dark Horse comics – being relaunched and expanded next year – and it’s not like there was another Buffy movie or television series he was involved in that has been killed as a result of this news. It just means that someone will be doing a different Buffy that really, honestly, can be ignored if you’re not into it.

(I know, I know; this is the counter-argument to my feeling that Caprica somehow lessens Battlestar Galactica in retrospect. I am a fickle, contradictory beast, what can I say?)

And is it really that wrong to be curious about what someone else can do with the ideas behind Buffy? The notion that monsters and demons and horror ideas can be used as stand-ins for the teenage experience is surely potent enough to stand up to multiple explorations by multiple people, and I’d be lying if I said that I wasn’t interested in seeing someone who’s actually been a teenage girl can bring to the whole “metaphor for teenage girldom” thing (Not to say that Joss couldn’t write teenage girls well, because – obviously, he could – but still). Am I sad that it’s going to be done as a reboot of something that ended less than ten years ago, and still exists in spin-offs and the hearts of fandom everywhere…? Well, yeah, to be honest – I’d much rather see a new idea than a rehash of an old one. But, to be cynical, any new idea would’ve just been branded a Buffy rip-off anyway, so at least this addresses the elephant in the room by… co-opting said elephant.

The oddest part of the whole thing – The part that, I think, catches a lot of folk off-guard – is that Whit Anderson, writer of the new movie, is a completely unknown quantity. No-one seems to know anything about her work, her style, her anything other than what appeared in her LA Times interview, and that brings with it all kinds of feelings for many people: What makes her the person to reboot this beloved franchise? Why is she so special? (A favorite comment from a disgruntled fan commented on the fact that the LA Times piece had such a large photo of her, as if the fact that she was attractive was enough to get her the job. Sadly, that’s not really the way Hollywood works, something I found out after years of expensive and ultimately useless plastic surgery). Admittedly, the fact that you can’t look at previous work and pull an opinion from that makes it so much easier to assume the worst, but I’m choosing to do the opposite: I’m going to hope that the only way an unknown writer gets a major studio to back such a potential nerdbomb as a Buffy reboot is by having an astonishingly good pitch that makes it worth all the hassle and ill will from fans who’d rather see the franchise dead than done without Joss.

I could be wrong. The end result might be a terrible, terrible thing that I’ll wish I could trade in for that amount of time and money back to use in similarly unproductive ways. But if that’s the case, then, screw it. I’ll just go to Netflix Streaming and watch “The Body” again, and think of happier times. Until then, though, I’m keeping fingers crossed and hoping that this reboot will mean more Buffy, and an introduction for all the people who never saw the show or read the comics or even knew she existed before. Once more, with feeling, you could say.

  • Jay

    Fail.

  • Ian Explosivo

    I’m with you on this one. Season 8 (the comics) was a complete disaster, so anyone who wants to put Joss Whedon up on a pedestal can go right ahead I suppose. I’d be interested to see what Whit Anderson can do though!

  • xoxomar

    Ah, come one! Dollhouse was amazing! It was ahead of its time and misunderstood, but it posed a lot of interesting ideas and the acting was superb IMHO…

  • Jay

    Okay, I can’t really be that snarky, but I’ve got something to say because I can’t find anyone else really saying it.

    Nothing you say is unconscionable. In fact, it’s pretty reasonable. But since WHEN is anything about Buffy reasonable? We skirt this fact in posts and commentary all over the web–the fact that in saying nothing could ever amount to Joss & Co. on Buffy what we’re really saying is

    WE WANT JOSS & CO!! Is it so hard to admit that we fans take it personally that we LOVED something so hard, and all we want is to see them one more time. A very good graphic representation of Nicky Brendon and Sarah Michelle Gellar is NOT Nicky Brendon and Sarah Michelle Gellar.

    I love parts of season 8–it’s a novel idea that has made me smile at times. When the art and the dialogue beautifully evoke the spirit of the characters it’s awesome, but we all know deep down that it’s not what we want. What we want if for the Kuzuis to wake up one morning and in a uncharacteristic, nigh mystical fit of altruism GIVE US BACK OUR GIRL.

    And it’s probably not going to happen. Ever. And now we have to deal with Whit, talented as she may be.

    And Dollhouse rocked–beautiful disaster of the first kind.

  • http://twitter.com/tomdaylight tom

    Doing it against the explicit wishes of the character’s creator, virtually everyone involved with the show, and pretty much the entire fanbase (or at least the vocal element of it) – combined Hollywood’s current ugly fashion of rehashing, revamping and rebooting everything in lieu of developing new ideas – I can’t see any good coming of this.

  • http://www.michaelminneboo.nl/blog/ Mike

    The thing is: WHY make a reboot at all? I think what people want to see is maybe a continuation of the original TV-series in a series of films. That’s probably never going to happen except for in comic book pages. But if it does happen I think Whedon should do it. It’s his baby.
    If this new reboot turns out to be a turkey, this probably will be the end of the whole concept.

  • Jay

    That’s my point. It might be FANTASTIC. I mean like out-of-nowhere great. But it’s not what we want.

    Fandom is a selfish thing, but on this point we are not fickle. We’ve had to put up with 7 years of hedging and rejection. Want Buffy back? Have a comic book. Want a Spike spin-off? Sike, not gonna happen. Why oh why is filmic continuation of this franchise in it’s truest form so damn hard to align when it’s the only thing so many of us want? At the end of the day it’s just the cold and hard will of a few over the many.

  • http://twitter.com/TheCocoaCritic CocoaCritic

    Joss Whedon created Buffy. To make a reboot without him is disrespectful. No one should be supporting this. It’s underhanded move.

  • werehawk

    “Ah, come one! Dollhouse was amazing! It was ahead of its time and misunderstood,”
    Maybe so
    “but it posed a lot of interesting ideas”
    Yes
    “and the acting was superb”
    No, no, and no. Dushku was incredibly unbelievable as different ‘people’. She (like many an actor/actress) is limited to one role

  • werehawk

    I agree that I would like to see a Whedon-Buffy movie, but writers/creators change all the time (be it comics or tv shows or movies). Why should Buffy be any different? Calling it disrespectful is ignorant and unrealistic. It’s not like the ratings support a bid for a movie as is (despite a hardcore fan base). Probably we should give it a chance (though I suspect it is going to be awful).

    Now Buffy versus Twilight – that is an idea!

  • Doctoraquaman

    I’m pretty sure this is going to fail horribly. It just seems like a decision not made for creative reasons but because some idiot producer thinks he or she can make a quick buck off of an old idea.
    Still, I have often said that if anyone wanted to throw a ton of money at me to make a reboot of anything, not only would I do it, I would try to make it the greatest reboot anyone has ever seen. I can believe this writer wants to make a good product, but it doesn’t mean it will happen.
    In the end, I will treat this like I did the Kolchack the Night Stalker reboot that was made before, that it is an alternate reality/Ultimate universe story. If it is bad, it will quickly vanish, but, if it succeeds, it could be like Abram’s Star Trek which help revitalize the franchise without having to erase all the continuity from the original universe.

  • TheLoneCreature

    But isn’t that like saying: ‘Stan Lee created Spider-man. He should be making the films and/or writing the comics now-a-days?

  • http://anothercomicgeek.blogspot.com/ Westside_goth

    I don’t think that characters from the show or comic can be in the movie because the rights to those characters are tied up with Whedons production company and Fox’s and they are not involved with this, just the producers who own the rights to the original Buffy movie. Basically Buffy was one of my least fav characters in the series. So why would I care about a film without the supporting cast?

  • Bow

    What a load of rubbish, this buffy reboot is gonna fail! Buffy without Whedon, Gellar and the rest of the Scooby Gang aint Buffy!

  • Bailjumper

    Stan Lee stills writes for the Spider-man comic strip, does the occasional back-up stories and cameos in the movies. Plus he’s given his blessing to current storylines, even the One More Day arc.

    Joss hasn’t given his blessing to this and looks to be kept away completely from this.

    It’ll be a bigger failure than the Last Airbender movie. At least people will know it’ll be barely reconizable from the original.

  • Tals

    Personally, I think that the biggest issue ISN’T who is and isn’t working on this film, but the context in which it’s being worked on. This film is being made in a time when Twilight is a major cash cow that others are trying to emulate. And ultimately, if you take out the ensemble/”Scoobies” in Buffy the Vampire Slayer (which the studio has said they will do), Buffy can EASILY look like a Twilight wannabe if written and produced by the wrong people. And this isn’t to say that Whit Anderson is the wrong person– we just don’t know, and that’s scary as all hell.

    So ultimately, the fear isn’t simply that Joss Whedon isn’t working on it, but the franchise which “properly” portrayed vampires will betray the people who have stood by it against the hoard of Twilight fangirls and try to be what we all dislike.

    Now, does that constitute anger from fans? No… not at all (or at least not yet), given that this is all pure speculation. But I am certainly beyond afraid and not looking forward to its production.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alan-Alexander/502988241 Alan Alexander

    The whole thing reminds me of “Scarlet” the book (and later, tv miniseries) written as a sequel to “Gone With the Wind” that was published in 1991 despite Margaret Mitchell’s own stated belief that there should never be a sequel to GWTW. I imagine Buffy Redux will go about as well.

  • http://twitter.com/MichaelSacal Michael Sacal

    You’re going to burn in fanboy hell.

    Just kidding… I don’t see anything wrong with the reboot either.

  • Jrau18

    Stan Lee stepped down from writing Spider-Man. He personally handed it over to someone new. Whedon is still doing Buffy right now. So it’s not the same. It would be like someone rebooting Avatar.

  • http://twitter.com/black_bile mark coale

    I was stubbornly against the new BSG “on principle” and was finally worn down by friends and/or critics who raved about the series.

    It’s possible this new Buffy could fall into the same category.

    As someone who has grown weary of the “official fan fiction” that is Season 8, I would not mind seeing a new interpretation.

  • Siege81

    Angel a fresh start on you tube is real fan love not this crap

  • ATK

    Look, I’m not opposed to a new Buffy, well I am, but I am willing to give it a shot. If you get the right people and the right story it could be good. I think the overall point of the fan community is that Joss expanded this unverse and included so many memorable situations and fantastic characters that it would be impossible to replicate. The new Buffy would throw all that out and go back to the movie which was c+ at best.
    Again I can be wrong, I enjoyed the Italian Job with Marky Mark even though it had absolutly nothing to do with the original other than they referenced it as a movie and kept the minis. It was enjoyable and made me get over the fact that the original and remake are two seperate properties. However the polar opposite of that is “Posieden” the original was fantastic and had a wonderful element of god vs man vs survival that was completely destroyed by the remake. This is what we are afraid of, if they remake it and make it good then more power to them, but if they simply line up the elements and water it down, it would set new hights for horribleness.

  • Margot Le Faye

    So, you missed the part where they said this Buffy would not be in high school? Here’s a partial quote from Charles Roven, one of the producers, taken from the official press release:
    “…while this is not your high school Buffy, she’ll be just as witty, tough, and sexy as we all remember her to be.”

    Let me repeat: not your high school Buffy. Ergo, everything you argue about the potency of monsters as metaphor for the high school experience, your interest in seeing how someone who actually was a teenage girl can write the experience of a teenage girl is moot. Are you still interested in seeing what they’re going to do?

    It’s my understanding that the reboot is of the original movie, only, with none of the characters from the TV series, because those are owned by Fox rather than Warner Brothers. And, really, what was that? Cute, air-head cheerleader learns she’s destined to continue an eons-long battle against vampires and finally defeats one that’s been killing her fellow Slayers for centuries?

    The Buffy that inspired a hardcore fandom is so very much more than that simplistic premise. Is it surprising that most of us want to give this a pass?

  • BuffySeriesMegaFan !!

    The First movie of buffy the vampire slayer was crap, But The Tv Series Staring Sarah Michelle Gellar, David Boreanaz, Nicholas Brendon, Alyson Hannigan, Anthony Head, James Marsters Well i was massive fan if they an love the series comic etc but if they carried on where the series left off an had the orginial cast reprise there roles it would be amazing And i would love to watch a buffy movie an have Joss whedon have some take an say on which direction the movie goes etc

  • TheDemon

    PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE don’t give Cameron any ideas.

  • ZB

    Joss Whedon has been employed many, many, times to rewrite other writers scripts and with other writers characters. Speed, Toy Story, Waterworld, Alien Reserrection for example.
    And on Buffy as head writer he rewrote many of the scripts written for the show by other writers.
    Why can he re writer others writers work but no one should be able to write Buffy?
    I’m a huge Whedon fan and suspect this movie, if it ever gets made, will suck. But Whit Anderson has done nothing wrong and I’d do the same if I were in her position.

  • DanAR

    Eh, both series involve a teenage girl pining for and eventually having relations with something that is essentially a corpse.

    Yeah, Buffy had better writing, characterization, and tone. But, the lead character is still a necrophiliac no matter how one tries to rationalize it.

  • Tryst

    It’s hard enough to get people to understand why BtVS the series was so great when they only have knowledge of the movie. This is just going to make it more difficult. It also highlights the problem with intellectual property rights in Hollywood. Joss created Buffy.

    Someone else, especially a noob like Whit Anderson, shouldn’t be contaminating it with their vision. Seriously? This noob thinks she can write as well as Joss? Pretty arrogant of everyone involved.

  • http://www.facebook.com/strivearth Zen Strive

    Joss Whedon is the reason hollywood goes so emo and angsty. Can’t wait for Avengers: The Earth’s Mightiest Whiners.

  • Anonymous

    Here’s the deal:
    BUFFY hasn’t even been off the TV for 10 years. A TRUE reboot would wait at least 20-30 years. Let the ORIGINAL show have it’s time, THEN come back and do what needs to be done. As well, a TRUE reboot would have the blessing of the creator at the very minimum.

    This “project” will never be accepted by fans of Whedon’s work. Why? Because HE doesn’t accept it, or give it permission to exist. There’s no way those of us dedicated to the man that brought stuff like Buffy will ever accept this garbage from a kid that has NO true respect for the show whatsoever. If she did, she would listen to what was said and stop work on it.

  • http://forwhenifeellikesharing.tumblr.com/ Bear

    I bet Buffy would slay a Devil’s advocate.

  • Cforshaw67220

    You completely missed the point. ‘Buffy’ was created by Joss Whedon, and neither he nor any of the cast have shown the slightest support for this movie. Even worse, the only people involved with it are the mercinary Kuzui’s who ruined the original movie by sucking any of the obvious talent that we quickly saw from the TV series out of the film. Even, even worse, this has none of the supporting cast that made the TV series work, and therefore would suggest that it would make more sense to rename the main character, and allow people to come into it fresh and able to appreciate anything original they can bring to the concept. Instead, what they are doing is trading on the Buffy name in the worst type of cynicism towards the fans, assuming that they will flock to see something that has no connection in the slightest towards the television series.

  • http://twitter.com/MichaelSacal Michael Sacal

    Since it’s a reboot they can always introduce characters that are evokative of the ones from the TV show, or even better than they are.

    They are not limited to using the characters from the original movie, they can create new ones too.

  • Cforshaw67220

    No. Everything about the concept is unreasonable. They have essentially spat in the face of Joss Whedon by not even discussing this with him, and in the face of the fans they seek to exploit by proposing a film that won’t include anything that has anything to do with the original series. It may bear the same name, but, really, if you buy a computer game you’ve waited to play for months, and when you get home you find another equally good game in the box instead, most people would still take it back because it isn’t what you asked for.

  • Jem

    ok, calm down, everyone. trust me when i say i am a HUGE buffy fan, and that joss is one of my artistic idols, so keep that in mind when i say: this at best GREAT news, and worst… not news at all. please, don’t get angry about this. of COURSE it’s nothing more than… studios cynically and shallowly cashing in on the vampire craze, and yes, it is a reminder of hollywood’s shameful lack of new ideas. but see past that.

    worst case scenario: another crap movie in a sea of crap movies. your old buffy dvds are not ruined, neither are your memories of the show.

    best case scenario: new life is breathed into a universe untouched by the mainstream for seven years. new fans are attracted, the movie makes millions and proves that there’s a whole lot of commercial and artistic value in the franchise. joss gets richer. and buffy’s place is further cemented in the hall of iconic heroes.

    joss always wanted buffy to be an iconic hero like batman or superman, and part of their nature is to be constantly rewritten by new people — sometimes well, sometimes not. (and if there is to be a “reboot” of buffy, i’m GLAD joss is not involved, as much as i adore and worship him and his work, because this can be something new.) i sympathise with joss, because this has to sting, but he’s created this iconic hero — she doesn’t belong to him, anymore. that’s the thing about art (especially in this world where intellectual property belongs to cynical, capitalistic studios, for better of worse) — once you’ve made it, you’ll always get the credit, but you no longer own it. the world owns it. as for buffy… she belongs to us, now. and anderson is one of us.

    again: i sympathise with joss, and this was a low, shitty move on behalf of the studios. but we have to be careful not to completely idolise one man (remember too that buffy was the cumulative work of many, many people) and say that since someone else is writing it it can’t be good, or say that since he doesn’t approve of it, neither should we.

    furthermore, this writer, this whit anderson person, is, again, ONE of us! railing against this will hurt the franchise, and hurt a person who ostensibly is a true and sincere buffy fan (anderson). it’s also worth pointing out that the movie’s being written by a woman who was herself empowered by watching buffy in her youth. i can think of little more inspiring…!

  • Jem

    also keep in mind that this isn’t a sequel but a reboot. it’s its own continuity. don’t like it? ignore it, just like you’d ignore the eric bana hulk or a crappy comic book run.

  • Cforshaw67220

    You cannot say “Season Eight was a complete disaster” – your comment is misleading as it offers opinion as fact. Also, do you know Whit Anderson? Cos everyone else seems to have no idea who she is… Seems to me that if that is the case you’ll be interested on my fat, white guy take on ‘Buffy’.

  • Cforshaw67220

    No. Joss Whedon was the last guy to work on ‘Buffy’ in any format, and he made the entire concept as popular as it was, and he is still available and working – in fact, working on concepts far more popular and well-known than ‘Buffy’ with ‘The Avengers’. But the fact is that no-one seems to have even given him a call or mentioned it in passing. Meanwhile, Stan Lee was still involved with Marvel and Spider-Man long, long after he left the comic, and was involved with the films, even if it was just a cameo and meeting the people making them.

  • Cforshaw67220

    Good point.

    Never mind that he was uncredited on ‘Speed’ because the previous writer demanded a sole writing credit, which hurt Whedon, so he has always made sure other people get the credits and respect they deserve from the work they have done for him.

    Oh, and Whit Anderson has done something wrong – if she had any respect for the character or the work she is doing, surely she would have tried to get in touch with Joss and made sure he was okay with it, or made a statement to that effect by now. Instead, all she has said is how happy she is. So I guess so long as she is happy, that is all that matters…

  • Cforshaw67220

    I’m pretty sure they call the person a ‘vampire’ rather than a ‘corpse’ because they are a ‘vampire’ and not a ‘corpse’. Therefore, Buffy and Bella are paraphiliacs – paraphilia being an attraction to vampires. Necrophilia is completely different.

  • Cforshaw67220

    The new ‘Battlestar Galactica’ was launched about 20 years after the series had reached its conclusion, and, with all due respect, it was a shoddy Star Wars knock-off originally. The examples don’t compare.

  • Mark T

    The thing that comes to mind is Star Wars. It was iconic. An enormous part of a huge number of people’s lives. Buffy may not be quite as big but in terms of effect it’s not unreasonable to mention them in the same sentence. “At worst an easily ignorable addition”… The Star Wars prequels killed an institution for a lot of people. The death of a Titan in the name of profit. Whit Anderson may in fact be the spiritual successor to Kubrick, but there’s a fairly large chance she won’t be and if the movie tanks, for whatever reason, then it’ll be another reason for perenially risk-averse Hollyweird not to trust unknowns and up-and-comers. Another reason to retreat into the realm of generic teen movies with busty starlets. BTW If looks and fame don’t make Hollywood tick then how do you explain Paris Hilton?

  • Cforshaw67220

    It isn’t even 20 years since the movie. Plus, are they even going to get as good a cast? The original had Rutger Hauer and Donald Sutherland… Is it likely they’re going to get anyone interested in this? Especially as Whedon has the ear of indie actors like Mark Ruffalo, and currently bankable stars like Sam Jackson, Scarlett Johansson and Robert Downey Jr.? Actors do talk to other actors, and you are probably going to see a lot of people not interested in getting involved with what has to be seen as a toxic project.

  • BennyBebop

    It wasn’t just Joss who made Buffy what it was. All the talent that made Buffy are loyal to Joss, except for the cashing in Kuzui freak shows. AND, they have no talent. I can pick up the snap of Espenson, the gravitas of Fury and the sauciness of Noxon in Buffy. WHAT DID THE KUZUI’S actually do? Part of the original and namesakes on the series. Nothing on the DVD extra’s, nothing in print, nothing anecdotally. They have no grasp of the Buffy universe. If Noxon or Fury asked Joss if they could do it and he said “sure, go ahead” I would love to see it. This is a kick in the knickers and it will not be appreciated by anyone with a brain.

  • no ad hominem

    This noob thinks she can write as well as Joss? Pretty arrogant of everyone involved.
    The arrogance is hardly one sided, it would appear. The problem is not with Anderson–it’s the studio system that demands a constant supply of marketable product. believe it or not, Joss started out as a writer on other people’s babies as well. Everyone starts out a noob, and there’s nothing wrong with her wanting to get a shot at something bigger. If it sucks, as it might, then that’s a shame. But she has the right to try.

    You may return to your unreasonable statements now.

  • Spiderbarbarian

    I disagree STRONGLY abt Season Eight. Season six was a disatser. Season eight was very well written and had quality writers.

  • mdk

    Public Enemy still said it best: “Burn, Hollywood, Burn!”

  • DanAR

    It doesn’t matter what they call the revenant. It still meets the definition of corpse. Animated or not.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RQOIFTELPCV3XMEHA4I63S3DOE Kate

    In 2008, Joss and the series cast (or at least, the majority of them) discussed the possibility of a Buffy film. Everyone on that stage said that if Joss wrote the script, they would play their roles.

    It’s 2010 now, and while Joss has been busy with his other projects, I see no reason why he couldn’t have asked some of the show writers to work on a few scenes for the film. After all, that’s how they wrote the series, so why mess with a good system?

    There’s no Whedon-written script because Joss didn’t write one, plain and simple. There is no reason why he can’t write one now, either. Look at Capote and Infamous – two movies about the same person that were released around the same time. This could still happen… if Joss wants it to.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_RQOIFTELPCV3XMEHA4I63S3DOE Kate

    I agree with this. I did like the series, but I preferred Sierra and Victor to Echo. Week after week, it was like, “Faith’s an FBI agent! Faith’s going to a party! Faith’s running through the desert!”