Why The X-Men: First Class Images May Mean Trouble For The Movie

  • 144 Comments
 
Why The <i>X-Men: First Class</i> Images May Mean Trouble For The Movie  

So, X-Men: First Class director Matthew Vaughn hates that leaked pic from earlier on this week, and has released official pics from the mutant prequel to show what the film really looks like. Why do I think that Fox would rather everyone see the leak than the real deal?

I know, I know: It’s a little like kicking the movie while it’s down, considering the reports about how troubled the production is becoming, with Vaughn editing the movie while it’s still being shot elsewhere, by persons unknown. But am I really the only person who looks at this -

- and thinks “This looks like Austin Powers, and not in a good way?” And is this -

- really supposed to convince me that things aren’t being parodied, even a little bit?

It’s odd, reading interviews with Vaughn where he talks about the movie “trying to get [the X-Men] back to being whole again” and not bastardizing the franchise, while at the same time looking at images that seem as much influenced by the original Randall & Hopkirk (Deceased) as anything I’ve ever seen in an X-Men comic. It’s not that I think that First Class will definitely be a terrible film – although, I admit, I think there’s more than a small chance of that being the case – but that I think that going for such a stylized aesthetic runs the risk of severely limiting the movie’s appeal at the exact time where Fox wants and needs this to be the most successful X-Men movie they’ve done. After all, while it’s possible that people want to know the origins of the X-Men as a team, do they really care about it happening in the late ’60s, complete with period details, ascots and swinger clubs? Okay, so maybe yes to that last one, but you know what I mean: Is there really that big of a crossover between people who want to see superhero movies and people who want to see lovingly recreated period pieces that wouldn’t go and see this movie no matter what, even if just to bitch about it afterwards?

(I can’t work out if I actually like the promo images or not, personally. I think that I don’t, but then there’s a contrarian element in my head that says, “Well, at least he’s not just copying all the other superhero movies,” and I start to wonder again. But then I think, “It’s not even as if it’s Mad Men-esque period classic, it just looks dated,” and and and.)

Vaughn may be convinced that Fox wasn’t behind the original image that leaked, showing the characters from the movie standing beside one another in a manner that recalled earlier X-Men movie posters, but if the rumors are true, he’s clearly not the one in charge of this movie, never mind the future of the franchise. It may have looked bad – the costumes looked ridiculous, and if nothing else, the Photoshopping just looked unprofessional and badly done – but it looked like what people expect an X-Men movie to look like, or all of its flaws, and I’m sure that’s what Fox wants to use as the selling point for the movie: “It’s the X-Men, starting all over again, but still recognizable as what you loved before.” And, if Fox and Vaughn are on such different pages when it comes to how to sell the movie, imagine what the battle will be like when it comes to the movie itself…

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    I’ve really only ever heard “It was bad”, “I didn’t like it”, “They were utter garbage.” I have yet to be told any valid reasons why they were bad. They had a plot that made sense, okay-to-decent acting, above par special effects, and they were fun. That’s more than you can say for most movies.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    “incomprehensible mess, while completely ignoring or destroying any character development from the first two films”

    I had no problem following the third movie. “Incomprehensible” is invalid. And how did it destroy the character development of the first two? The only characters that were previously fleshed out were Professor X, Wolverine, and Magento. The others were one-dimensional.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    EXACTLY. X-Men 3 was the only one that really felt like the X-Men had come to life. It had problems, sure (Cyclops should have turned into a badass, not a whiney brat), but it was still a lot of fun.

  • Charli J

    He may not have had a reason why they were but he had proof that it was good, you have not told us yet what made it bad (exept for opinions…”Utter Garbage”) Have you even read the comics? They were epic just like X3 (and X-Men Origins, bits and peices)… Read all of the comics and see if any of them didn’t have epic action..

  • Charli J

    What movies really have all of those elements rolled into one?? Tell me, not many of the comic book movies that came out this decade did that…

  • Charli J

    Did you know if Bryan Singer did the movie, he was considering casting Sigourney Weaver as Emma Frost(free fact of the day), and Magneto and Xavier aren’t exactly young… I don’t really see anything that wrong with the comtinuity. One more comment: It think that it was a good choice to leave out Scott, Storm or Jean Grey.They should save them for the next First Class if they make a sequel.

  • Charli J

    If you have soooo much knowledge, than go out and reirect the series, no ones stopping you!!! Obviously they aren’t following the X-Men comics word-for-word, but they did put elements…which is okay, so stop ranting about the could-have-beens, the movies came out and made their mark, some people like them, some people don’t whether you like it or not so GET OVER IT!!!

  • Bassmonster

    Let`s all calm down and think… this movie could have fallen into the able hands of someone like, say, Joel Shumaher or the bloke who`s directed the old Captain America from the end of the 80`s.
    Don`t forget the hype and buzz of Snakes on the Plane and what it`s turned into.
    X-Men reboot deserves its chance – and it is up to us only to give it.

  • Rob

    Having both Hank McCoy and Alex Summers in the movie and then setting in the 60′s is a bit disconcerting. It almost makes Alex old enough to be Scott’s father rather than his brother. But if they were to change his name to Christopher or maybe even Nathan, that might make things a bit more interesting.

    I know the timeline can get a bit hard to manage when you have Magneto’s origin rooted in the concentration camps of WW2.

    Also, with the recent X-Men movies set in the ‘not-too-distant-future’, wouldn’t it make more sense to set this movie during the period of the 80′s? Height of the cold war, and all of a sudden a new power base arises, threatening the fragile peace between America and Russia?

  • Talmerian

    What was that plot? I remember there being the gathering of the Brotherhood of Evil Mutants, The Mutant Cure, and The Rise of Dark Phoenix. Wildly different concepts jammed together to try to get as much action as possible. The ending fight was trite and ridiculous…there was no heroism in the movie. It was awful. Wolverine was OK for the beginning then that Deadpool thing showed up and the reactor and Jean Luc Picard’s ghost (or something) just an awful ending to a movie that was only mildly entertaining. If you are entertained by explosions and action, and that is all you need, I am willing to bet you’ll grow out of that! In the meantime I’d like to see FOX try to tell a story and be less sensational. Perhaps win an Oscar, the story of the X-Men could be told at that level. They just want your money though and don’t care how bad the movie is.

  • Talmerian

    We can all hope that this does worse than any of the previous X-movies and Marvel gets the rights back in 5 years. Then they can bring the X-Men into continuity and tell stories that are y’know, good.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_YFS3XUQHCCWBPZQ25KXCJ4I7J4 Joe

    Disney is doing what to the X-Men franchise to kill it? I admire your effort to find conspiracies where they don’t exist, and I mean that in the most pleasant way a back handed compliment can be.

  • J. McNamara

    I like the part where Wolverine drives his motorcycle from upstate NY to SF, CA only to drive back so he could return in a jet. In one afternoon.

  • becerro

    i know that ”SUPERHEROES MOVIES ” are yous adaptations of the original sources (comics) and i will never expect to be full exact with all the details and that the writers take that as a scapegoat to do whatever they want with the characters but WOLVERINE ORIGINS WAS CRAP CRAP CRA CRAP and i have to say only one word to prove my point ”’DEADPOOL”

    love the character being reading for almost 10 years and i was ANGRY AS HELL when i walk out of the theater

    maybe this will not be as bad as that CRAP , but im sure i will not be as successful as X1 and X2 , that costumes looks like a cheap cosplay
    maybe if january jones show more SKIN .will ve succesful but then KIDS wont be allowed to see the movie and little kids are the only ones who just see the movie to see it , and give a crap about truthful fact in characters history LIKE YOU KNOW ”DRAGON BALL EVOLUTION”
    the WORSE CRAP since BATMAN & ROBIN

  • might be good actually

    Well aside from the Magneto /Xavier relationship…this movie IS NOT faithfull in anyway to the comic origins.
    I give it credit for being a 60s period piece and not an excuse to do a “Twiglight” teen casted movie.
    As a movie seperate from the comics this might work.

    Personally i thought Xmen 1-3 were overated and kinda stupid. ( and hardly faithfull to the comics)
    Wolverine was terrible too.

    oh and by the way— SPIDERMAN 4 will be THE WORST movie of all time. That costume is an insult to fans.

  • x2 was overatted/ boring

    lolol there were logic problems in X3 and total mishandling of Scott & the professor. Thats my biggest beef with it.
    Otherwise X3 was THE BEST of the 3.
    1 & 2 were not only BORING but hardly faithful to the convoluted comics.

  • Omegasaga

    On its own- WOLVERINE had some logic problems but was otehrwise an enjoyable flick.
    In terms of being faithfull to the comics… well they just made up shit as they went along.

    NONE of the characters in WOLVERINE were a part of his origin.
    ALSO – Logan has always been a 4 ’9 little runt & hairy all over……NOT a 6 foot tall handsome, lean, hairless heartthrob.

  • Omegasaga

    The real problem in adapting anything X related is that ALL the x books since the early 1980s are a gigantic CONVOLUTED nonsensical MESS.
    Endless numbers of 1 dimentional characters that have overlapping origins & alternate timelines.

    Dont get me wrong- i loved the JIM LEE ERA of X books but technically its all been a pile of fanboy shit since Jean Grey died. ( 31 yrs ago)

  • Omegasaga

    The dumbass fanboy writer of this POINTLESS article obviously never saw THE AVENGERS 1960s TV show. Just because austin powers has been the most recent ( and megapopular) film set in the 60s– doesnt mean they are copying the look of it.
    Thats retarded to think that.

    Um this is what people wore in the 60s u moron.

  • Danny Wetts

    Uh, Charli, I’m not a lawyer specializing in entertainment law and copyright, but I suspect someone WOULD try and stop me from refilming the entire X-trilogy and releasing it.

    I love these tools whose only response is ‘oh yeah, well could YOU do it better?’ — we’re talking about movies, and hence, art — so you, and I, and eeeeverybody else is entitled to like or dislike whatever we want, and then tell the world what we think. You don’t like that, Charli, then consider moving to North Korea.

  • mfactor00

    People actually think that chick playing Emma Frost is hot? this movie is gonna suck donkey balls and everyone knows it. So stop trying to defend it.

  • Skippy

    Cyclops was freakin’ KILLED—him being a whiny brat was the least of his problems.

  • Michael

    In every single iteration of the Origins of the X-Men that I’ve seen, Scott and Jean were right there, from the beginning. It doesn’t seem right to me that they are being left out of “First Class.”
    And to everybody saying that Cyclops was a whiny b*tch in X3, well, Scott has always had his “whiny b*tch” moments in every run, no matter who was helming the ship.
    Now, I liked X3 and Wolverine. I’m not saying I’m Gene Shalit, but I can recognize and distinguish between a complete piece of film trash (i.e. Hasselhoff’s Nick Fury thingy), and a somewhat decent flick (Incredible Hulk(the most recent one))

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    Wait, who are you calling a moron? Me or the writer of the article? Because the comparison with Austin Powers isn’t mine.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    Him being killed was a good thing to me.

  • http://twitter.com/MrRandyWatson1 Randy Watson

    I honestly think The Wolverine will be the best one of all. Darren Aronofsky directing Hugh Jackman in a movie based on the best Wolverine storyline ever (the Claremont/Miller Japan one)? Fuck yes.

  • spiralvirus

    Because Bryan Singer is an artist and Brett Ratner is a ham-fisted frat boy. Not as good.

  • Kajusx

    Just a point of clarification for anyone asking, “Why can’t they have the original five X-Men?”

    If you’ll recall, Ice Man joined the X-Men in X-Men: United. Angel showed up for the first time in Last Stand.

    How are they supposed to tell an origin story with the five original X-Men when the film franchise’s continuity has already nullified that option?

    The stills for this film are not what is troubling me (and by troubling me, I mean BARELY troubling me, because come on, we’re talking about a movie here). Rather, the link to the other article about the reshoots as well as Vaughn’s own worries are what is troubling me.

    Realistically speaking here, First Class has nothing to lose. Sure, Last Stand and Wolverine Origins were financially successful, but the bar has been drastically lowered. Hopefully Vaughn and his screenwriter won’t get trampled by the board room mentality of the studio and he’ll compromise only when he must. Film-by-committee is never a good way to go, which was all too apparent with the last two films (as well as Spider-Man 3 with Sony demanding Raimi throw Venom into the mix).

  • spiralvirus

    I like how Wolverine gains a few hundred pounds of metal on his skeleton and suddenly leaps out of the dunk tank like the weight wasn’t there. Oh, and how he could smell Creed from the job site, but couldn’t tell that his girl was still alive in his arms. Then there’s the epic “walk stoicly away from the explosion behind me” scene.

  • LightningBug

    Pardon my rudeness, but this article is idiotic. It could all be edited down to a single sentence: “The X-Men First Class images may mean trouble for the movie because in my opinion they are bad. Love, Graeme McMillan”

  • Jukeebox

    Well, I know something about movies, ’cause I work with audio-visual production, first thing I’ll say is based on that film fact.
    X1 and X2 were kind of a good movie (great for their year), but not epic, while, X3 did try (evidently) to please the fans, and that went down wrong. Even thou the scrip seamed solid, the direction was lost, and it was a movie FULL OF RESOURCES but no time or heart given to it. It was like “we need this to be ready, but it’s still half way, lets keep things simple”.. well, they should have thought of that before they put so many ideas in the same film. In X1, we could see that Bryan S. thinks too much of himself, he took some risks that (luckily) worked to the new crowd and did not displeased too much the fans. In X2 he was more cocky than ever, he was trying to make and MAGNIFICENT BLOCKBUSTER, well, he made a catastrophe movie, like, the xmen have to save the whole planet, but the planet wasn’t in danger and it’s an xmen movie, could be more about them and less about the action scenes.
    Now, let me say something about the potential in x-men.. and it’s not in the x-men group, but in the mutants as a “kind”.. think about it, hero movies are cool and all, but those movies usually keep been in the same level, with a pattern, not that that is a bad thing. The problem is that x-men could be more sensible in it’s scrip, dealing with the problems of prejudice, the adolescents wanting to be something else, the kids having to grow up fast and so many other cool stuff that had only a second of attention in each of those movies. Imagine the scenes of Angel cutting his wings and running from home across the city, or rouge at the begining of X1 dealing with her powers, or the attack to the xmansion in the X2 movie.. think about Grant Morrisons run on xmen and even whedon’s development of the characters in astonishing.. and the stories told by Craig Kyle with Christopher Yost.. if only a fraction of that were put in the movies, they would be remarcable, I would go insane.
    I enjoyed the movies very much, but only when letting my fanboy-side outside of the theater (of course, it kept on taking a pick.. lol)..
    BUT WOLVERINE WAS TERRIBLE, I ALMOST CRIED!!! I thought it was FOXs way of trying to kill the x-franchise so when the mutants went back home (to Marvel), they would have trouble convincing people to go to the movies to watch such a crap thing. After I saw WOLVERINE the movie, i get sad when I see deadpool (LOL).
    *I still want a live acting TV series about the xverse very well done, please.. ;)

    Cheers!

  • Stuart

    I don’t like Vaughn as a director, it is already clear that he made it big riding Guy Ritchie’s coat tails. His movies are inane trite and he butchered Stardust, one of the best fantasy novels ever written. First Class could have been good, but these photos looks like a lot of bad choices are being made at a lot of levels.

  • Blow_up_the_outside

    sorry but this article is crap. the image of prof X is nothing like a parody, hes looking the part quite well i say.

  • O.

    I think this movie looks just fine and could possibly be the best X-movie we’ve gotten yet (though that wouldn’t be too hard to do). The first image doesn’t look like Austin Powers either; if it did, at least Kevin Bacon would be wearing some floral print or groovy colors. Admittedly, at first I wasn’t interested in a ’60s piece but now I am.

  • http://wadefurlong.daportfolio.com/ WadeFurlong

    This is not X-Men, not in any shape or form. It’s some reinvented (as you said “bastardized” interpretation). Sad, I will not put any money into supporting such…

  • Shaun

    After all these years, I’m not much of an X-Men fan at all. Way too much overexposure, and don’t get me started on how absolutely boring I find Wolverine to be – and I used to love him back when he first appeared!

    However, these pictures look fine to me and, quite frankly, I think that you are reading way, way too much into very, very little. But I guess that is what the internet is for – take virtually no information and then ramp it up in an echo chamber until it takes on a life of its own.

  • Thomasjacksonjr_3000

    I think it should be a reboot with the original five or base it on the ultimate x-men. You have to be remember that 20th century has the rights and they want to create their own X-Universe. I think a reboot with the founding five members would have been very cool. I am not crazy about what I have seen so far. I hope Marvel gets the rights back very soon. i know they wish they had them right now.

  • JDMcDub

    X-Men 3 and Wolverine wre as terrible as we fanboys made the out to be.

  • Lobocomics

    yes… it is urgent that Marvel gets the rights back of these properties:

    X-Men,
    Daredevil
    Fantastic Four… on this note… I am dying to see J.J Abrhams directing a FF movie with The Mole Man (paul Chiamati) as the bad guy… with kick ass giant monsters tearing NY, and a cool CGI Thing cloberin’ the monsters… wishful thinking.

  • mars

    How shocking, a character from a movie set in the sixties dresses like other characters in movies set in the sixties. Of all the characters Emma will be the one at the height of fashion.

  • mars

    I thought Wolverine was very good, but then again I don’t really care that much about the continuity for Wolverine and Deadpool. It was what it was and for what it was it good.

    X Men 3 had issues because they used Wolverine at the expense of Cyclops. Had the emotional finale been between Jean and Scott it would have been much better. I was also upset about the direction Rogue went in. She was barely in the movie and got cured. that was insulting to the character.

  • mars

    Emma Frost is one of my least favourite characters but I will watch this because its X Men

  • Cfgodwell

    THANK YOU! I thought I was the only one that wondered why “Mr. Super-Senses’ could not detect a faint heartbeat or that her pheromones were still active. I cannot stand that movie and I just wish they would erase it. FOX is a draconian movie company. Period. They seize control and they don’t care how much it tanks the entire franchise, they want control. This looks like the definite end of the franchise and if that is Bastion standing with them in pink skin, I am already done and will be purchasing this on bootleg. YEP, I said it!

  • Cfgodwell

    That is because fanboys (even though I can be one at times) only are concerned with matching costumes (which look ridiculous when translated to reality), eye candy and seeing the silliness of the books translated to screen, which is usually disastrous with the exception of Spider man (1 & 2) and Batman (Begins and Dark Knight) which were beautifully executed. X3′s best features were Juggernaut, Madrox and the Sentinel scene in the Danger Room. I didn’t like Dark Phoenix being cut to a club meeting in the woods and on a bridge, the Cyclops death was unnecessary and Angel being a kid instead of an original XMan was a total failure. They retconned Beast into the script and the same should have been done for Warren. I will pray for Marvel with this one because it seems as if they have lost total control of their franchise.

  • Cfogdwell

    @Talmerian: you have managed to put my sentiments about that dreadful Wolverine movie and that ACTION PACKED X3 crap into words. The same people that loved those two movies are the same morons that moved Transformers 1 and the ultra-racist 2 hour ARMY commercial Transformers 2. That Deadpool was the absolute worst translation of a character to the big screen sine Cat Woman and that was BAD BAD!!! Fox is the EXPLOSION company! They don’t want a story or a plot. Just explosions, toys, Burger King glasses, more toys and money. They could care less about the fans and I personally cannot wait until the entire FOX grip on the XMen franchise lapses. Until then, good luck with wasting your $13 on this…movie.

  • Philip

    Well, let’s see: the murder of Cyclops led to the interminable Logan/Jean pairing, which is just crap on every level – and apparently led to Wolverine, of all people, becoming the leader of the X-Men (because, you know, a loose cannon with knives in his hands is the PERFECT candidate for a leadership position). In fact, the film as a whole was focused even more on Wolverine than the first two put together, because clearly we needed more one-note stabby-stabby action. The scenes were muddled and stitched together with all the skill of a butcher trying to do needlework (the scene with the Golden Gate bridge randomly changes from day to night and back again with *no explanation whatsoever*), the killing of Xavier was undone with a pointless post-credits scene that kneecapped the movie’s big plot development (as did Magneto being hinted at getting his powers back). Characters were thrown at the screen with such rapidity that they were rarely even given names, instead often being vaporised or otherwise disposed of without even getting a single line of dialogue. Vinnie Jones used the idiotic internet meme “I’M THE JUGGERNAUT, BITCH!” in his dialogue. The whole Phoenix plot basically ignored the hints laid down in the previous two movies about Jean’s increasing powers being down to the machine Magneto built in the first one (see Jean’s reaction differing from her team-mates) and essentially stated that the Jean we’d got to know in the first two films was actually a fake personality draped over Jean’s real personality – and said real personality was in fact an insane all-powerful monster. Angel is introduced as if he’s going to be a big character (as the film’s trailers suggested), only for him to show up for a very short amount of time, bugger off, then fly back for a bit and then go away again.The film is an unpardonable crime against cinema, and the only really good thing about it is Kelsey Grammer’s Beast..

  • Cfgodwell

    I have been collecting XMen since issue number 98 and have absolutely every issue following. IT WAS GARBAGE. It was forced, sped into, ran through, overdone, lacking of a cohesive plot, confusing and there was no need for the Dark Phoenix other than to say “we did it”. The cure itself could have been a big enough plot with a real writer. The movie was just FOX squeezing the blood out of the franchise for a buck. One Singer said he couldn’t do it, it should have been held off. Period. Instead what we got was EXPLOSION: Featuring the Xmen.Come on, we even got a beautiful Callisto int he form of Dania Ramirez, who is gorgeous, but probably just cast so that fat Matzo roll of a director (Rat-ner) could get a date with er. Be for real. SUCKED.

  • Cfgodwell

    Singer probably was so into Jackman that he couldn’t resist. (wink wink).
    I thought he did a pretty good job, for a basketball player height having Wolverine.

  • Cforshaw67220

    Someone on the Internet is wrong?! But who?!?!?!?!

  • Cfgodwell

    I feveryone pays attention, it seems that Scott, Jean and Storm are out because one would assume (with a full head of hair Xavier) that they were too young and irrelevant during the timing of this piece. Now, if only they can get around to explaining why EMMA is a grown woman in the 60′s and a teenager in her unnecessary appearance as Silver Fox sister (??????) in Wolverine (which was supposed to be circa 70′s-80′s), then maybe I would even bother to give them my hard-earned money to see more ACTION PACKED crap. I ado agree with you on Incredible Hulk, Michael. The Ang Lee version ruined it for the second one.