10 Things To Hate About Star Trek: The Next Generation

  • 164 Comments
 
10 Things To Hate About Star Trek: The Next Generation  

Star Trek: The Next Generation was my first real Star Trek series. I was born too late for the original show (and the animated follow-up, for that matter), and as a kid, the re-runs just didn’t do it for me. But ST:TNG debuted when I was thirteen, and I was completely sold on everything from Picard’s calmness to Troi’s plunging necklines. I avidly devoured every new episode, and couldn’t wait for more… which should’ve been a sign that I shouldn’t have rewatched the show recently, really. Here’s ten things I had forgotten about the show

The Show Was Clearly A Product Of Its Time
You have to give The Next Generation this – It’s dated so much worse than the original Trek. I don’t mean culturally (Although the design of the original has at least had time to become retro cool by now), but the visuals: Being shot on video, and with special effects that ranged from pretty cool to really kind of terrible, the show now looks more like something far cheaper and lower quality than the average Syfy Saturday Night movie, and it’s hard to get that out your head while you’re watching.

The Show Was Offensively Inoffensive (1)
By the 24th Century, interpersonal conflict was a thing of the past in Gene Rodenberry’s mind… which makes for some appallingly dull viewing, when all of the regular cast is just one big happy family, getting along except for when one or more of them gets possessed by some alien that, more likely than not, was just looking for understanding all along. TNG is an amazingly therapist-friendly show, refusing to cast blame in almost any direction, which probably would make for a utopian society in which to live, but not one to set a drama in.

This Here Is An Allegory
The original Trek had its fair share of clunky allegories, don’t get me wrong, but at times it felt as if that’s all TNG was: Every single week, it seemed, the show would tackle a real world subject with the attitude of “But it’s happening to aliens,” and the crew of the Starship Enterprise would come along, frown and tell them off like their parents, and everything would be over within an hour. Which would’ve been more tolerable if the real world problems were more daring than “bigotry is wrong” over and over again.

The Show Was Offensively Inoffensive (2)
For a show that was so strongly politically correct, it was also surprisingly timid. Remember when the original Trek made television history by having the first on-screen interracial kiss? Yeah, nothing like that in TNG. Also, after the multi-cultural original cast, the almost entirely caucasian TNG crew seemed like a weird step backwards, especially considering one of the black actors played an alien, and the other spend most of his time keeping the engines running…

Riker And Troi: Science Fiction’s Most Passionless Unrequited Love
Yeah, that’s right: For all of their supposed backstory of lovers-torn-apart-by-duty (Recycled from Star Trek: The Motion Picture, as I realized when I rewatched that the other night; what can I say? I’m on a Trek kick, and it’s on Netflix Watch Instantly), Riker and Troi managed to keep their respective flames hidden by having almost no chemistry onscreen. I blame the actors, for the most part, but at least Jonathan Frakes had an air of constant amusement about him during everything past the second season, so the writing has to be partially responsible, as well.

Almost Everything About Data
I know, I know: This is like saying that I hate Santa Claus, isn’t it? But Data never really did anything for me beyond provide deus ex machinas and annoy me. We’d seen the “What does it mean to be… human?” thing before with Spock (and, weirdly enough, again with Ilyaprobe in The Motion Picture… Hmm), and Brent Spiner’s portrayal shifted from naive to oddly smug somewhere during the show’s run, making him all the more irritating.

While I’m At It, The Rest Of The Crew, Too
Okay, perhaps Patrick Stewart can be saved from the deluge of “Well, they weren’t the greatest actors in the world” scorn, but there really was a level of acting ability from the regular cast that seemed to favor broad soap opera-scale reactions to anything subtle, charming or believable wherever possible. I’m looking at you in particular, Michael Dorn. Klingon or not, there was far too much bellowing happening there.

The Borg
From exciting two-time problems – their first appearance and the “Best of Both Worlds” two-parter – to completely and utterly overused characters that ended up becoming boring as a result, the Borg may be a masterclass in how not to use villains in a continuing narrative. I’ll admit that Voyager may hold even more of the blame for this than TNG, but still: This is where it all got started, and let’s face it: Voyager already has a terrible reputation (somewhat deservedly).

Those Uniforms
Oh, come on, like you don’t agree on this one, at least. Especially in the first couple of seasons, where they were all wearing those all-in-one things.

It Ruined The Franchise All The Way Until JJ Abrams Saved It
The Next Generation, through its success and the fact that it became the benchmark for what Trek should be all the way through to the cancellation of Enterprise, changed what had been a series about exploration, adventure and more than a little goofiness into something more sober, serious and… well, less fun, really. It took a lot of the imperfections of humanity out of the ideas behind the show, and replaced it with… well, I’m not sure that it really managed to replace it with anything lasting, given the way that each successive series tried a new gimmick to fill the gap. You can watch an original Trek and, yes, it’s nowhere near perfect, but there’s a sense of excitement and discovery and lack of embarrassment that’s compelling to watch, but The Next Generation has this… ashamed quality to it, as if just doing science fiction at all is a little too lowbrow for its own tastes, and so it’d rather do something more cerebral and “meaningful” instead. It took Abrams’ 2009 revival – which many claimed was closer to Star Wars to Star Trek, which may point to something in and of itself – to bring some of that stupid, gut reaction back to the franchise… and he left it so much better than it was, when he found it.

The Next Generation was a show that we loved at the time, perhaps, because it’s what we had: It was new, and it was on every week. But now that we can look back and see it in more of a historical context, surely I’m not alone in thinking it was kind of terrible more often than not, right?

  • Jeremy Clarkson

    Even the Borg wouldn’t assimilate you Graeme McMillan, you’d be a waste of their resources. 

  • trlkly

    Going cerebral is not going beyond science fiction. It’s what science fiction is. That’s what there is to enjoy about it. And how could TNG have ruined Star Trek when it was what Star Trek was for longer than anything else?

    And, seriously, the uniforms ruined the show for you? Why would ANYONE agree with that? That puts everything else in a different light. Everything you talked about can be taken as superficial, so having a point that is only superficial makes those other points look like you meant them superficially.

    And how can you blame TNG for ruining the Borg? They showed up four times, in episodes that established who they were? You’re once again blaiming TNG for the problems in its successors.

    Star Trek: The Next Generation revived Star Trek. It took it in a bold new direction. Sure, trying to copy it with Voyager and Enterprise didn’t work, but that’s not because TNG was a bad show. It’s because copying a show doesn’t work. TNG tried to copy TOS in the first couple of seasons, and it tanked badly.

    And now Abrams is taking it an entirely new way. As you point out, it’s Star Wars, which isn’t even science fiction. Sure, the old show was fun and had character drama, but it was still cerebral. It wasn’t all about the characters, it was about characters and ideas. Hopefully, the sequel will have some ideas again. If not, Star Trek will crash again.

    Because Star Trek didn’t crash last time because it wasn’t fun. It crashed because there were no new ideas.

  • trlkly

    And how does a lack of character make it not science fiction? What makes TNG the “Jesus” of science fiction is that it doesn’t let character get in the way of the intellectual pursuit.

  • trlkly

    If you can see what appear to be wires, it doesn’t matter if the facts say there really weren’t any. The point is, you could see something that made it look fake.

  • trlkly

    So not Greek Marina Sirtis, or British Patrick Stewart? That’s four, to TOS’s two. (Chekhov is what we would consider racist today–a caricature of Russians)

  • trlkly

     Nope. He was ruined in Voyager. He made perfect sense in TNG.

  • Bilbobaggins

    so you’re basically saying every single star trek show after the original series sucked? i don’t think so. i agree, next generation is EXTREMELY overrated, but i love voyager and enterprise. 

  • Dalkri

    How can anybody not like Data? He is the best character in Star Trek period. Data and Picard are the only reason to watch this show, the rest of the cast sucks. DS9 is by far the best ST series there is. The only character in TNG besides Data and Picard I actually like is O’Brien and he is hardly even used. 

  • Dalkri

    Biggest thing to hate about TNG is Tasha Yar. Worst character ever created, and they couldn’t just let her die either. They had to ruin the Romulans with her. 

  • rich

    Have to agree with the author of this article. I’ve just been watching reruns, and I keep thinking to myself, ‘how could I have thought this was so good?’ The acting and scripting are so often really poor.

    By the way, the reason I found this post in the first place is because I had just finished an episode that was really boring and poor. I just googled “star trek next generation bad acting” and followed this link. My search was just a gut reaction to what I had been watching.

    Thanks for the article.

    Rich

  • Mike Chambers

    I have to disagree with nearly everything in this article. I concede a few points. It was SOMETIMES “offensively inoffensive”, but it usually wasn’t THAT bad. Most of those bits I have to blame on Picard. He often tried too hard to be unbiased.

    I also agree with the whole Riker and Troi thing. It never really felt like they were ever very close. It just felt tacked on.

    Other than that stuff, you’re nuts! The uniforms, after season 2, I thought were actually pretty slick looking. Even before that, they weren’t THAT bad, really. The only uniform-related stuff that really made me cringe were the dress unforms they sometimes had on the men at more formal gatherings. That was just… weird.

    TNG was a product of it’s time? Not really, other than the bulkiness of the tricorders and that sort of minor stuff, I think TNG’s sets and effects stood up well to the test of time. There were some poor, dated-looking special effects in season one which somewhat improved in season two. Now season three and later? I honestly think that nearly all of the effects from that point on still look great even now. Yes we can do better in 2013, but there’s nothing cringe-worthy about it. It was all good enough that even now I don’t even have any second thoughts or think “wow that looks like crap” about it.

    About Data, sometimes there was more focus on him than deserved. Like the episode “Data’s Day” (it’s not even a creative title) and the one where he and that one woman in the crew had sort of a relationship. That one was just plain cheezy. It made me cringe. Other than those, no they didn’t focus too much on Data at all.

    The borg? As has been mentioned there were only six borg episodes! The first is one of the best TNG episodes ever. The only borg episode I didn’t care for was the one where Data’s “brother” Lor became a sort of leader of the borg on some distant planet. Come to think of it, every episode about Lor sucked actually so it may not have been the borgs’ fault.

    Last but not least, J.J. Abrams did a good job with the 2009 Trek movie, but do you really believe that TNG “ruined the franchise”?? Man, Next Gen *SAVED* the franchise, FFS! If TNG never came to be, Star Trek would right now be nothing but a small cult classic. TNG is the best thing that ever happened to the Star Trek name, and I’d hazard a guess that at least 80% of all Trek fans became so thanks to TNG.

    Voyager is what killed Star Trek, and then ST: Enterprise raped the rotting corpse. Abrams breathed some life back into it after those two disasters.

  • Mike Chambers

    Yeah, Tasha sucked. I don’t know why they ever brought her back for cameos later in the series. The whole reason she left was because Denise Crosby was being a huge bitch demanding more focus on her boring character than deserved, but didn’t get it. I would have been like “No, GTFO” if she came back later looking for work.

  • Mike Chambers

    Riker and Worf have their moments too. Riker’s weird. Sometimes he’s just a huge asshole for no reason, and other times he’s like the nicest guy alive.

  • Julia

    Oh you are SO SO SO not alone. I just made the mistake of trying to watch an episode again and I was literally gnashing my teeth with annoyance at the whiny, limp politically correct dreck by the end. It was IRRITATING. I never could get into that show even when it was on, and I’m a huge original Trekkie. The first show is still classic and powerful. And yes! DS9 was pretty good, too. Only place where I don’t agree with you is regarding Data. I guess I’m just a Brent Spiner geek, but I found his character funny, frank and quite adorable in a non-cutesy way. At least, let me put it this way: his character had more real development than any other on the whole damn show!