Why NBC’s Wonder Woman Should Seem Much More Familiar…

  • 105 Comments
 
Why NBC’s <i>Wonder Woman</i> Should Seem Much More Familiar…  

Is there a word for the opposite of anticipation? Is dread really the word I’m looking for? Whatever the correct term would be for what I’m feeling, Thursday’s casting news for NBC’s Wonder Woman brought that feeling out in spades. Why isn’t anyone else getting DC Comics deja vu about the car crash this project is turning into?

Here’s the thing: For a while there, I really wanted to be enthusiastic about David E. Kelley’s Wonder Woman. Sure, the script doesn’t look that good, but it’s being reworked, and there are many shows that have terrible pilots and then turn into pretty good series in the end. Also, I have a love-hate relationship with Kelley’s work that left me hoping that, just maybe if Kelley could get over his love affair with whimsical cuteness and letting his politics — which I happen to agree with — overwhelm his writing, something interesting might come out of his attempting to get outside his comfort zone a little with an Amazon warrior princess. And then … and then it turned into Catwoman.

You remember Catwoman, right? 2004 movie starring Halle Berry and Sharon Stone? Complete and utter train wreck that everyone involved, right down to DC Comics themselves, like to pretend never happened?

Consider the evidence: Catwoman‘s lead, Halle Berry, was considered an unexpected choice for the role who doesn’t exactly match the picture most people had in their minds of the character, but nonetheless, someone who wasn’t necessarily a bad choice — just like Adrianne Palicki, the lead in Wonder Woman. Catwoman was campy as all get-out, unlike the tone of the comics at the time, and Kelley’s Wonder Woman — exec by day, crimefighter by night and a woman who just can’t get her love life in order no matter what! — is … well, just the same. And then there’s the villain.

I’d be the first person to say that Liz Hurley is no Sharon Stone. For one thing, Liz is known more for her fashion choices than her career choices — although, sure, beyond Basic Instinct and Casino, I’d be hard pressed to remember too many of Sharon’s career choices — and for another, at least Sharon can act. But both starring as the villains in their respective projects just seems like stunt casting, the idea of “Let’s get these two hot women fighting! There can be a catfight at some point! Awesome!” instead of … well, anything else, like whether or not they make sense for the role or seem credible as über bosses or whatever. Sensationalism over substance.

More than anything else, the casting of Liz Hurley convinces me that Wonder Woman will be cheesy camp, lazily substituting cattiness and familiarity for anything worthy of the character and her history. I’ve been disappointed by Catwoman before, and don’t really need to go through that again with Wonder Woman, you know?

  • Wyatt

    Well, I have never read anything from the Silver Age, nor do I care what the origins of Superman’s (or any other character for that matter) costume are/is. So an attempt to attach me to that era is mistaken. That much having been said, you are WAY WAY too far down the rabbit hole. ALL explained origin(s) for ANYBODY’s costume are subject to change every 10 to 20 years. Latching on to one and holding on come Hell or high water is probably not healthy. And if you cannot see the humor in this thread, well imagine if you overheard two sports geeks arguing for over a day about the origins of the pinstripes on the NY Yankees uniforms, because that is equally entertaining.

  • JimMacQ

    Stupid question: in what way is it that Adrianne Palicki “doesn’t exactly match the picture most people had in their minds of the character”?

    I know if I were casting the role, I’d look for an attractive brunette, in her late 20s, tall, athletic, and with some experience performing in genre material such as superhero or fantasy shows. According to the link you provided, Palicki is 27, 5’11” tall, and has appeared in Supernatural and the Aquaman pilot. The IMDB link on that page shows that she played Supergirl on Smallville. She also does cartoon voices and was an athlete in high school.

    In what way does she not fit the role of Wonder Woman? Because she was blonde on her last show? It’s called hair dye.

  • JimMacQ

    You’re really getting worked up about the story somebody made up at least 60 years after the fact to explain Superman’s costume?

    He wears the costume because he’s Superman and that’s what Superman wears. Nobody but the most continuity-obsessed fanboy cares one whit about the in-story explanation for it.

    Please stop. You’re embarrassing comic book readers around the world.

  • JimMacQ

    “Wrong. I disparage the use of the costume when the character is 12 and his still using it when he’s 35.”

    When I was 12, I wore jeans, Converse high-top sneakers, and a Batman t-shirt. I’m 52, and right now, I am wearing jeans, Converse high-top sneakers and a Captain America t-shirt. Are you calling me pathetic?

  • Anonymous

    I thought this article was about the forthcoming Wonder Woman TV pilot so how did it degenerate in to a pointless argument about Superman’s costume, it would be nice if it got back on track.

    So here’s my two cents casting Liz Hurley is a mistake sorry but she can’t act, the costume i have no problem with with them giving WW trousers, (sorry i know Americans refer to them as pants), instead of the butt revealing swimsuit of the comics, i think the top half looks fine and a reasonable adaption of the proper costume but the boots should be red and white not blue which make them indistinguishable from the trousers.

    As for the casting of Adrianne Palicki as WW/Diana Prince the actress I’ve only seen her in the episodes of Supernatural she’s appeared in as the murdered girlfriend of Sam Winchester in which she was fine in but it was only a small part and she’s only been back once or twice since getting bumped off in the pilot and the episode of Smallville she was in as the fake Kara/Supergirl from the end of season 3 which i seem to remember finding her a bit wooden but if she has developed as an actress that’s fine I’ll wait to see her in action before rushing to judgement.

    The script leaked onto the internet seems weak and to centered on her work love life balance which is not what WW should be about Kelley is a great writer on his shows which have all centered on the law his forte and their have been good female characters on them but i fear he could turn her into a caricature.

    What this needs is help from comic book writers who have written for WW but what every WW or even just comic book fan wanted was the Joss Whedon movie or at the very least like i said a comics writer who knows the character and can create a believable version for fans and non fans to tune into week in week out on a series not just a pilot.

    As for the articles’ author and his Catwoman comparison based on casting it’s a fair one to make, that thing was one of the worst movies of all time but here’s a little trick comic fans and DC can do just simply erase it from their minds as it was in no way other than the movie title is it connected to the character from the Batman comics.

    Finally i will watch this and try to avoid seeing the opinions of those who’ll see it before me when it does eventually air so as not to colour my judgement. i hope that the script kinks are worked out as I’d like to see more superheroes make it to the small screen to successful shows as done right it could be where they are better served with the chance to create and develop story lines over episodes and entire seasons.