Who Could Take Over From Aronofsky On The Wolverine?

  • 13 Comments
 
Who Could Take Over From Aronofsky On <i>The Wolverine</i>?  

So, Darren Aronofsky is off The Wolverine to the surprise of no-one. But who should Fox go to to replace him, and keep the surreal indie cred that Aronofsky’s attachment brought to the franchise sequel?

Superhero movies are at an odd time as a genre, with audiences over the initial “Oh my God it’s superheroes on the screen and it doesn’t suck” wonder, and looking for something new. Increasingly, it seems, that “new” is coming in the form of directorial choices, and in that sense, Aronofsky’s signing on to do the sequel to X-Men Origins: Wolverine probably shouldn’t have come as such a surprise as it did – After all, we’ve had critically-acclaimed directors in the franchise before (Hello, Bryan Singer), and more recently, someone of Kenneth Branagh’s caliber taking on Marvel’s Thor, so why not Aronofsky doing Wolverine 2?

Of course, his first interviews on the subject suggested why not: He talked about the movie not being a sequel, but a standalone movie about the same characters from the franchise without actually belonging to the franchise, for one thing. That alone should have sent shivers rushing up and down the spine of Fox execs, trying to maintain the franchise in the run-up to X-Men: First Class being released this summer, but surprisingly everyone seemed to continue to be excited about the whole idea, the whole danger of letting this Oscar-nominated filmmaker take over their superhero movie.

But now he’s gone, dropping out because he can’t be outside of America for so long, which seems… well, a little odd, considering that must have come up at some point earlier in the negotiations, with Hugh Jackman so excited to shoot in Japan and Australia since before Aronofsky came onboard. But whatever the real reason, it doesn’t change the fact that Fox needs a new Aronofsky, and soon. But who? Aronofsky is a hard act to follow. It’s not just that he has the mainstream critical acceptance, it’s that he still has an indie credibility from earlier movies like Requiem For A Dream and Pi. Who else has both of those?

The name I keep coming back to is Duncan Jones, whose Moon and upcoming Source Code has shown a similar love of movies that push the viewer to think (or, perhaps, just get their minds bent by the experience) as well as working within specific genres. He’d be a perfect choice to replace Aronofsky – maybe even a better choice than Aronofsky – if Fox wanted to continue down that particular road, but somehow, I can’t see that happening. Maybe it’s time to revisit the shortlist of directors up against Aronofsky for the gig way back when, and see who’s available… Maybe this could end up being Gary Ross’ time to shine after all. I mean, Seabiscuit is just like Wolverine, right…?

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    I was surprised.

    /spite

  • Raheem

    Loved “Moon,” but don’t really see that tone working for a “Wolverine” movie. (Not that Duncan Jones is only capable of making that type of film.) I have sort of a random suggestion: David O’Russell. He’s already replaced Aronofsky once (as director of “The Fighter”) and knows all about the angry emotional outbursts that make Wolverine go “snikt!” Just ask Lili Tomlin.

  • nokiki

    I came from the other side of the pond and here is my insight.

    My dream team would be Quentin Tarentino (followed by Stephen Chow from Kung Fu Hustle, and John Woo). I nominate the three because they all had successful experiences in big-budget acting oriented films.

    + Christopher Doyle (cinematographer who did Hero, Ashes of Time and lots of Wang Kai Wai movies). He is superb … also a Sydney native. Hugh should be able to get him.

    + Joe Hisaishi (music score, lyrics, he is greatest at what he does)

    + Gordon Liu/Yuen Woo-ping (monumental martial art directors)

    I am sure my team will beat Darren’s team and work out really well artistically and commercially for this movie.

    And for the location, if they really can’t go to Japan there are a few Japanese towns in China that are built for movie studios. One is in Zhong Shan Movie and TV town. Another is in Heng Dian World studios. They can be based there and fly to Japan whenever necessary. Since Snow Flower Secret Fan was shot in Heng Dian, maybe Wolverine can shoot in there or Zhong Shan as a last resort.

  • Darkstream

    David Fincher!

  • Tomfitz1

    I second that!!!!! SE7EN is my favorite David Fincher movie.

    I don’t know why the movie has to be shot in Japan, after the recent events in Japan, I’d hardly think that anybody’d be shooting movies there for some time.

  • Mwedmer

    Aronofsky was the best choice of Director for this film because all of his films deal with Broken people. People at a crossroads. That is what Wolverine is in the story they were going to do. Prt of it was proving he was a man, not a beast.

    Duncan jones is a decent thought but both of his films focus on someone who is isolated most of the time and playing with what that does to them. Source Code is like this as well as Moon.

    Not David Fincher All of his films which I enjoy BTW are very methodical. they have a rigid structure to them that pulls you through.

    Tony Scott could be a good Choice. Or even Oliver Stone. I know they are not who you may think of, but they can both deliver solid drama with a heavy dose of specticle.

    Alphonso Cauron would also be another good choice.

  • Lil’ Tim

    If it’s going to be based on the mini-series by Chris Claremont and Frank Miller why not have Claremont and Miller direct? Miller has already proven himself a brilliant director with Sin City and the underrated Spirit. Claremont started in theater, he would know how to work with actors. This would help ensure that the film stays true to the brilliant mini-series.

  • Michael

    Edward Zwick

    Seems like a high quality director and if he’s willing to revisit the Japanese (not to mention stranger in a strange land) themes he navigated so well in The Last Samurai then it really does seem like a good fit.

    Defiance, Blood Diamond, Glory … I think he could bring some weight to a Wolverine story that would be so much more than just another superhero movie.

  • Imaginet1

    Richard Kelly (Donny Darko ) or Gregg Araki

  • JMC

    I always thought Aronofsky was a bad idea anyway, so I’m not too concerned. He is an extremely talented director but not suited to the type of movie that needs depth but also a large amount of action. I didn’t want to see Wolverine sitting in a bubble staring at his navel and contemplating his existence.

    My choice –
    James Mangold (loved 3:10 to Yuma and Knight and Day was a fun flick)
    David Fincher
    Edward Zick
    John McTiernan
    and if wishing on a star Michael Mann

  • Bclewis6593

    Fincher’s plate is too full right now. With the Dragon Tattoo and is signed with Disney to do the 20K Leagues Under the Sea reboot after that.

  • http://twitter.com/JustinQuizon Justin Quizon

    I would love a Japanese director to give it a shot. Someone like…say Takashi Miike. God, I’d think that would be amazing. AND don’t judge him only for his superviolent films, the man is capable of SO MUCH more. Of course…he wouldn’t do it, plain and simple. My other suggestion would be Ryuhei Kitamura. His fights scenes are awesome and his style could fit very well with a Wolverine movie. BUT, again, I highly doubt it, Kitamura is on no one’s radar. Most likely we will get Shawn Levy (Date Night). Fox loves to work with him AND he just finished working with Jackman on Real Steel. Sigh….I really…really…hope they don’t go that route.

  • Jonn

    Saying the Spirit is an underrated film is like saying Nick Spencer is a good writer