Can All This Year’s Superhero Movies Be Hits – And Good?

  • 67 Comments
 
Can <I>All</i> This Year’s Superhero Movies Be Hits – And Good?  

We’re midway through the summer of superhero movies – Thor and X-Men: First Class are behind us, with Green Lantern and Captain America: The First Avenger still to come – and a couple of things have happened that you might not have expected. Is this the summer that ignores conventional wisdom and offers (gulp) good superhero movies that are also reasonably successful?

Of the two movies released to date, I think it’s safe to say that Thor did almost exactly what everyone both expected and wanted it to: It more or less hit expectations in terms of box office – and did so despite concerns that 3D might damage gross, which may end up being important by the end of the summer, interestingly enough – and was as enjoyable as people expected it to be (I keep seeing commentary to the effect of “It’s not as good as the first Iron Man, but better than the second,” which seems entirely right to me). But X-Men: First Class is the surprise in two ways; firstly, that it wasn’t as bad as many – myself included – had feared, and secondly, that it didn’t underperform as badly as many had expected (Yes, it’s the lowest opening of any of the X-Men movies to date, but considering the state that the franchise has been in since The Last Stand and Wolverine, I’m just surprised that it made more than the high $40 millions in the first place, never mind it dropping less than 60% in the second week). Does this mean that the audience appetite for superhero movies isn’t dipping? And, more to the point, does this mean that we’ll somehow magically get four good superhero movies this summer?

Well, we’ll see. Like almost everyone who’s seen the trailers, I have my worries about Green Lantern because… well, what is awesome on the comic page apparently looks day-glo dumb on the cinema screen. I’m also worried that it might be too out there for audiences used to the more grounded superheroics of Spider-Man, Iron Man and Batman – although, perhaps, Thor will end up acting as an accidental gateway drug to the full-on cosmic of Lantern for many moviegoers, which would be both ironic and probably annoying to the more realistic Marvel – meaning that, even if it turns out to be wonderful, it will still be far enough away from what audiences thought they’d get to release a wave of disappointment that could lead to box office failure. That said, audiences seem to dig the similarly ridiculous, out-there Transformers movies, and if the high concept of “Lord of The Rings meets Star Wars” means anything, it should mean “smash hit,” so we’ll see.

Similarly, Captain America: The First Avenger feels like an unknown, still. It feels very similar to Lantern – Relatively unknown character to non-comic readers, heavy on the backstory versus the high concept, with a well-known lead actor not known for this kind of role, and director that doesn’t necessarily seem like they’re cut out for this kind of thing. I suspect that, of the four, Cap will be the one that comes closest to failing, if only because I doubt that the international audience will be as excited to see such a patriotic/jingoistic character at the core of their big-budget bonanza, but… stranger things have happened, especially if rumors of Raiders of The Lost Ark-style tone and humor turn out to be true.

So, will this be the year when four superhero movies turn out to not only be good but also not eat into each other’s audience? I’d love to be able to say yes, but… let’s face it, what are the odds, really? Put your predictions as to which ones will end up letting us all down in the comments, as ever.

  • Unforgiven_mirror

    He’s reffering to the Cardassians, one of the alien races featuring heavily in Star Trek Deep Space Nine.

    And Mythos, of course people have heard of Portugal, it’s not exactly the best kept secret. I’ll test my knowledge for you. Portugal is a country on the west coast of the Iberian Peninsula. The capital is Lisbon. The language is Portuguse, a romance language stretching back to the roman empire. Portugal has a very good football team, who unfortunately failed to make it all the way to the finals in the world cup last year. They scored seven goals to none against North Korea though. A few hundred years ago Portugal was a naval super power and the Portuguese empire included substantial areas such as the current country of Brasil where they still speak a variation of Portuguse.

    how was that? I’m from Western Australia by the way.

  • Allentaylor8

    Why don’t you give it a rest? It’s obvious you’re a GL fanboy. You want GL to succeed, we get it. The guy was just giving his opinion based on some of the negative reviews that are coming out for the film. Guess what? All the critics that are ripping GL have already seen it and the general concensus is the film STINKS..BIG TIME! Thor was a good, solid, enjoyable movie…now don’t get all sensitive and upset about Thor’s success just because the critics are ripping GL a new one and it might end up becoming one of the biggest disappointments of the summer so far.

  • Matthew Lane

    Fanboy? Really? Wow, way to fail at basic rhetorical technique. Sure i want GL to succeed, why wouldn’t i. 

    As for reviews, so far there have been very few real reviews out. Alomst all the reviews that are out so far seem to be by people who have watched the trailer and infered the plot from that. We wont see any real reviews, from any sort of respectable reviewer for atleast another 24 hours at least. An even then i’d rather make up my own mind of the quality of the film then leave it up to the same critiques who told us Thor was a great film (it was not a great film).

    GL may be the worst film ever made in the history of everything, but since you haven’t actually seen the film yet, you personally can’t attest to that fact. At best you are passing off hersey evidence & internet whispers (from other people who also haven’t seen the film), as if they were fact.

    There’s no need to kill the movie before it comes out by passing judgement on its quality long before you’ve actually watched it.

  • Matthew Lane

    No its not. There are almost no real reviews out yet, but actual reviewers with any credibility. The people who are ripping the shit out of it have not seen it, they are just assuming its going to be crap.

  • Matthew Lane

    dude, he’s got every right to have disliked the film. At least he watched the film before judging it, unlike people here who are bad mouthing a film thats not even out yet.

  • Matthew Lane

    Wait Portuguese is a country… An here i was thinking it was just a way to cook chicken.

  • Citizen X

    I live in New Bedford, Massachusetts…highest population of Portuguese-Americans in the US.  The city just celebrated Portugal Day last Friday. I going to have some linguica
    and madiera wine and go watch Green Lantern.

  • Kanati

    I’m not judging the movie.  I’m still HOPING that it’s good.  And I’ll find out about 24 hours from now.  But I *can* judge the costumes based on the trailers.  And THOSE…  are not so hot.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    There are more than 60 reviews out. Those are “actual reviewers” with “credibility” and they’re tearing it to pieces. No assumptions are being made. They’ve seen the movie.

  • Bb

    Sorry but Thor was a weak movie, poorly writen and thought out. New X-men should have been better and I liked it more then Thor because it did give more, but It tried to put years of story into one movie and became a joke after a while. If Green Lantern isn’t a good movie it will be sad but will make the point that a good director and writer are needed for these movies. Warner has it right with Batman. That has to be the example.

  • Urizen

    No, there have been a lot of real reviews published. Professional reviewers are shown advance screenings of the films so that they can publish reviews ahead of the films release, this is nothing new. I don’t know where you’re getting all this stuff about no “respectable” reviews coming out beofre the premiere of the film. For example Rex Reed, a PROFESSIONAL reviewer for the New York Observer has called it:

    “as bad as it gets—a dumb, pointless, ugly, moronic and incomprehensible jumble of botched effects, technical blunders, and cluttered chaos. Oh yes. It is also—did I forget to mention?—boring.”

    Again, that’s not some anonymous internet fanboy venting his rage at the trailer. That’s how actual professional critics are responding to this turd.

  • Matthew Lane

    And Reeladvice (the movie website) review said: “The film’s direction might prove to be a negative note for some but for those who appreciate character development over flash then it fits the bill perfectly.”

    Kenneth Turan, Los Angeles Times Film Critic said “is both off the wall and out of this world — literally. More science-fiction space opera than superhero epic, it works in fits and starts as its disparate parts go in and out of effectiveness, but the professionalism of the production make it watchable in a comic book kind of way.”

    So straight off the bat (no pun intended), there are positive & mixed reivews coming in from crebile sources. It seems that the people who didn’t like this film expected it to be a huge action film & it was never intended to be a huge action film. It was intended to be a character piece with some action in it.

    It’ll be a while till i get to see it (as part of Australias punishment for getting Thor early, though frankly getting Thor early should have been punishment enough), but i’m reserving my judgement until after “I” personally have watched it. I don’t trust critics, as they have a tendency to make up there mind before they watch a movie & if it fails to meet the criteria for there presumption they mark it down accordingly. Critic thinks a movie is going to be an action film & its not, well then it fails in being an action film, critic marks it by the criteria of an action film. We’ve seen it before with critics and we’ll see it again.

  • Urizen

    “Character Piece”? Even out of the minority of critics giving this film a positive review, there’s a consesus that it’s a dumb blockbuster action movie and the visuals overshadow the story.  ”Short on story but visually entertaining, Green Lantern glows most brightly as a special effects showcase leaving dramatic pathos to other men wearing tights.”-Jonathan W Hickman”Green Lantern’ is purely a popcorn movie for 12-year-olds, who won’t be disappointed.”-Andrew O’Hehir”Cornball dialogue and poor characterizations drag down the successes of the incredible visual effects.”-Julian RomanIronic; for someone who seemed so concerned about only accepting negative reviews from “respectable reviewers” you have no problem citing a positive review from a seemingly anonymous blog contributor. A poorly written anonymous review full of grammatical errors which says the exact opposite of what most mainstream critics say about the movie. Sounds respectable to me.

  • Matthew Lane

    Not at all, i’m pointing out that not all the reviews are negative (& just for the record Kenneth Turan of the Los Angeles Times, is not an anonymous blog contributor). I’m just saying don’t let the general premovie bigotry of this film being crap colour your own eventual perceptions. It may indeed be the crappiest movie ever made, but until you personally watch it, the most you can say is “some critics who watched this movie didn’t think much of it.”

    Me personally, i didn’t think much of Avater when it came out, doesn’t mean it was a bad movie, just meant that i didn’t think much of its generally over done plot line, poor characterization & over reliance on special effects. Of course thats my personal opinion as someone whose actually seen the movie. All i’m saying is wait until you yourself have seen the movie before you all publicly denounce it. I mean seriously guys, this GL movie hatred has gone on from day 1, even before the filming started.

  • Rich

    After seeing Green Lantern last night, I can respond to the question in your headline:

    No, they aren’t all good.  Thor was fine but unspectacular, X-Men: First Class was quite good, but Green Lantern… blech.  Most disappointing film I’ve seen at the theater in years.  So much potential, and they screwed it up.  It’s already a critical flop, but now I’m curious what it will mean for future DC movies if it’s a commercial disappointment too. There’s a chance it won’t be, but its huge budget will require an impressive box office gross to yield a viable franchise.

  • http://www.facebook.com/david.schmitt#!/ David R. Schmitt

    But he also didn’t really qualify why he hated it. So his post came off as troll or nerdrage behavior.
    “Ending was idiotic” How so?
     ”The way people talked and acted around mutants was moronic” Example?
    “Magneto was a pretentious ass and hypocrite” In what scene?

    Simply spewing venom in a short little post is just as bad as trolling. This is a discussion forum but he had no ambition to discuss anything.

  • http://twitter.com/Maxkorp Maximus

    your crazy The Dark Knight is the greatest comic movie of all time & one of the best movies ever the only comic book movie to get several Acadamy Awards nominations Winning Best Supporting actor for the Joker………..specking on Green Lantern it was ok mediocre or middle the road at best….so far x-men first class was amazing the best x-men movie by far maybe the best marvel movie right up there wit spidey 1&2 & iron man….thor was a good movie not as good as iron man 1 but close waaaay better than part 2…..i think captain america might be the best out of all of them it has the best trailer by far & should have a great story