Doctor Who In Trouble? Some Thoughts On The Season 7 Split

  • 19 Comments
 
<i>Doctor Who</i> In Trouble? Some Thoughts On The Season 7 Split  

It’s tempting to read a lot into the confirmation yesterday that the BBC won’t be running the seventh season of Doctor Who throughout 2012, but instead splitting the season between 2012 and 2013, which also happens to be the show’s 50th anniversary. For example: Is Doctor Who in trouble, somehow?

It’s true, the ratings have taken a slight tumble in the UK since the end of Russell T. Davies’ run as showrunner, and the show has moved in a different, potentially more offputting direction that both makes it more child-friendly (Come on, “The Eleventh Hour” was a perfect kids’ show) and far, far less child-friendly (Killing off the Doctor and not saying “It’s all okay” after forty-five minutes? Kidnapping children and characters dying onscreen?) – a problem for the BBC, who have centered their entire Saturday evening schedule around the “family favorite.” But does the delay in the seventh season suggest that a retooling is about to happen?

More likely, it’s an attempt on the part of the BBC to try and get the show back under control, behind the scenes. Not only has the series just lost one of its head producers – Executive Producer Piers Wenger not only leaves the series, but the BBC entirely, to become senior commissioning editor of Film4 in September, it was revealed last month – but there have been rumors that this year’s change in format to a split-season with built-in three month gap was the result of trying to deal with deadline problems that had plagued the show’s fifth season… Something that may not have been too successful, according to some.

In a report denied by the BBC at the time, British magazine Private Eye laid the blame for the show’s misfortunes firmly at Wenger and co-EP Beth Willis’ feet:

Show insiders blame much of the chaos on the decision taken by Wenger and his fellow executive producer Beth Willis last year to dispense with the services of producers Tracie Simpson and Peter Bennett, both of whom had worked on the programme since 2005. The pair were subsequently invited to return but declined… Showrunner and lead writer Steven Moffat has become expert at papering over the cracks, re-ordering episodes and finding creative reasons for spectacular monsters and CGI creations to be given as little screen-time as possible to save cash.

(In response, Moffat tweeted “Private Eye seems like such fun, until it’s YOUR friends they’re spreading nasty, inaccurate gossip about. How horrible.”)

Shifting the season across the two years also frees Moffat up to concentrate on Sherlock, his other series – Nowhere near as much of a moneymaker as Who, but arguably even more critically acclaimed, and definitely almost as enjoyable – which lessens the pain of the loss somewhat, but I can’t help but worry that the change could ruin Moffat’s three-year plan for the show; not only will we jump to three and a half years to get the whole story out of the way (with a prospective nine month gap between seasons six and seven, in fact), but the standalone Christmas episode for 2012 will now find itself coming in the middle of what is likely to be a continuity-heavy season, judging by the previous couple.

Also, will the shift of the seventh season affect the show’s 50th anniversary plans? Will there be the beginning of an eighth season in 2013 as well, or extra episodes of some description? With Doctor Who, the BBC has a genuine example of a classic television show that deserves respect not only for the size of its fanbase, but also its accomplishments. For it to suddenly seem endangered just as it’s about to become one of the few shows to reach a half-century – It must be the first sci-fi show to reach that landmark, surely? – isn’t just sad, or worrying: It’s a potential embarrassment that the BBC should move to deal with as quickly as possible.

  • Davenport

    I’m choosing to blame the Tories and their complete mangling of the BBC.

  • GatchamanUK

    Heavyweight shows start in the Autumn.  That’s when Dr Who should be starting.  The show is running through Spring, when the kids should be outside playing.  I know children don’t go outside to play amymore, but let’s be idealistic here…

  • Michael

    My thought would be that they’re doing something big in 2013 – maybe not a movie, but maybe a string of specials or a massive miniseries or something, for the anniversary. This way, they can still show regular episodes of Doctor Who in 2012 *and* 2013, and have a season’s worth of budget for whatever the special thing turns out to be.

  • http://twitter.com/Edmcowboy11 Edmcowboy

    I don’t think anyone around BBC have ever heard of the saying, “If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it”  Although that seems to be a common theme of tv networks in North America too.  The executives look at a show and say “Hey this show is doing great, let’s find untried ways to make things better regardless of the consequences, and oh well if our idea doesn’t work we can always blame the fans for not supporting our idea.”

  • Alex H

    Just to randomly speculate here, but it might just be something as simple as the (British hosted) Olympics putting the squeeze on scheduling, or timing conflicts with any of the stars.  I strongly doubt Dr Who is going anywhere anytime soon, it’s too valuable for the BBC as what I’m assuming is its most profitable merchandisable brand if nothing else.

  • causticacrostic

    not to mention all the effort that they’ve been putting in to push the show to the american audience. it’s been fairly successful. 

  • Blackwinterskiss

    I agree with Alex H on the possibility of it being because of the Olympics. Since i dont know how they do the filming schedule of ‘Doctor Who’ I’m assuming that they will have all of the first half of season/series 7 done in time for it to air in the spring then it breaks for the Olympic preparations, Olympics, and then the dismantling of what ever is being done for the Olympics, start to shoot the Christmas episode and then finishing shooting the rest of season 7 for when they bring it back in 2013 which could very well be not long after the Christmas episode and hey it could mean a shorter wait for series/season 8

  • Shane

    Slightly off topic but speaking of Doctor Who and the Olympics, who wouldn’t want to see David Tennant carry the torch in costume as the Doctor. It would be even better if they take a leaf out of the LA Olympics and have the Tardis appear and he steps out to light the flame.

  • Reporterdave

    Lets face it, the BBC is still run by a bunch of sheltered talentless accountants.  They never should have  let Russell T go.  Now he’s in LA recreating Torchwood for the American cable market.  Too bad UK and too bad for the revived Doctor Who series.  I am affraid it will peter out again like it did in the late 1980s and early 1990s. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Adam-Hasser/1427822616 Adam Hasser

    Hopefully the break means more Sherlock. I really enjoyed the first 3 episodes and would like to see many more.

  • Aggamendon

    I’m not sad at all to see Davies go. His season of specials were… not good. 

  • Paultype40

    A few facts to consider, Mr Moffat is a fan and can be trusted to do whatever he thinks is best for the program. Money IS tight at the Beeb and they are covering the Olympics next year. The BBC is NOT going to ignore the 50th anniversary, simply not going to happen. The reason for the reduced amount of eps is NOT because of falling viewing figures. There have definitely  been production problems this year, we know this because of the loss of the producers and Wenger. Bottom line, the BBC need more time, to put right what ever is wrong, before the anniversary year, and perhaps the ONLY way they could find money for the Anniversary ep (eps?) was to reduce the run.

  • Thomas Rice

    ‘It’s true, the ratings have taken a slight tumble in the UK since the end of Russell T. Davies’ run as show runner’ = BULLSHIT  Exhibit A) http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/ratings-smatings-19146.htm Exhibit B)http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/who-breaks-more-records-20479.htm  Exhibit C) Compare this :http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/episodes/series-6-2011 to the first 7 episodes of this: http://doctorwhotv.co.uk/episodes/series-3-2007 And there is very little difference, regardless to what you think of the show, on terms of viewing figures it is EXACTLY the same, if anything the figures are better than ever, formulate actual fact before going into a pompous opinionated rant against a show just because a quite frankly AWFUL writer is gone…. 

  • Songbird Mlh

    you know, I have been watching and loving Doctor who since the Tom Baker days and with the new series starting in 2005, my kids now enjoy watching it with me too! They BBC REALLY needs to make sure it continues- it has definitly been a family “connector” and family friendly for us!

  • Songbird Mlh

    Oh and by the way….. I’m an american and Doctor Who was already pretty well known here before Matt Smith “came to America”…. however it is cool seeing familiar sites!

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_QKN5MHOI6VUFOYCTV5REK7M7A4 Jacob

    Doctor Who really isn’t well known in the states. Sure, among geeks and nerds it is, but that’s a very small section of the population..

  • Adel

    What are you talking about? Of course it’s well known in the states, a lot of people I know in several different areas grew up watching the series. It’s a damn classic for heavens sake, not just a sci-fi nerdfest. You must be one of the few living under a rock.

  • Sdfsdf

    I hated the last split series it ruined the programme. Dont do this again BBC.

  • Bobert

    I want rose Tyler back