The Lesson From This Summer’s Movies? Forget Everything

  • 64 Comments
 
The Lesson From This Summer’s Movies? Forget Everything  

As the famous saying from screenwriter William Goldman goes, when it comes to the movie industry, nobody knows anything. It’s been taken as a truism for years now, but this may have been the summer when audiences decided to prove that to studios once and for all.

The success of the Wednesday opening of The Help yesterday – outstripping expectations with a strong $5.5 overnight take – underscores something that surprised many studioheads earlier this summer: There’s a large female audience out there, and they’re hungry for good movies. The success story of the summer was possibly Bridesmaids, which massively outperformed what was expected of it, despite having Judd Apatow’s name attached as a producer. The lesson here is probably one about underestimating movies based on demographics – Looking back, the idea that Bridesmaids wouldn’t be a hit because it was a female-led comedy seems especially ridiculous; think of 30Rock, Parks & Recreation and other female-led television sitcoms, and then try and work out why people thought that wouldn’t transfer to movies – but there’s every possibility that it’s something even more obvious about learning not to believe any box office predictions based on anything other than hard evidence.

For example: Who really thought that X-Men: First Class would be more successful than Green Lantern? Who expected Cowboys and Aliens to flame out quite as badly as it did? Who really thought that The Hangover Part 2 would be nothing more than a more expensive retread of The Hangover? All of those went against the conventional wisdom of the industry (As did the fact that the superhero audience didn’t just up and collapse through oversaturation. Not to mention the success of The Smurfs, which I am tempted to say is the random event of the season), underscoring Goldman’s line, and making me wonder… Will this finally be the summer that makes the movie industry throw away the rulebook – or, at least, look at it a little less often?

With the exception of Transformers and, to a lesser extent, Thor, this summer was the one where sure things didn’t necessarily pay off; it was a year when playing it safe disappointed everyone, which – if this were any other industry – might lead to a rethinking of the value of playing it safe. In a world where a movie can have all of the “right” ingredients like Cowboys and Aliens and still flop, you’d hope that it would cause some sense of reconsideration over what “right” means. Over the last few years, the idea of “guaranteed hit” has begun to fade into the background, leaving the space open for this revolutionary idea: Just make good movies that you think will entertain.

The thing is, of course, it won’t happen. The lead time involved in movies means that the next few years are already scheduled with the same kind of movies and the same schools of thought as the ones from this summer, and unless audiences manage to resist the obvious lures of The Avengers or The Dark Knight Rises or The Amazing Spider-Man, it’s unlikely that we’ll get the same kind of odd summer of refusal of taking what we’re being offered again, so the moment will pass. But… Just imagine, as the saying goes. Picture a movie industry more about individual projects that people believe in than chasing after fads and fashions… Nice thought, isn’t it?

  • Faust

    I loved X2! Its the best out of the first trilogy!

    Although ‘X5′ has to do a hell of a lot of work to beat First Class IMHO! ;)

  • Faust

    I hate how just because Bridesmaids has a primarily all female cast – that the perception is only women went to see it?!? Who thinks like that?!? Did only men see Transformers, or X-men or Hangover 2. I wanted to see as soon as I saw that first trailer.
    For me (a male here!) Bridesmaids is the funniest fucking movie I have seen in years. Its not just a ‘chick flick’ its the BEST comedy out so far this year (and probably of last year too!).

    There is even disgusting toilet humour in it! haha… so funny!

  • Faust

    Twilight is aimed at ‘tweens’. The Justin Bieber crowd. So as long as there is a hot male lead (or two) and a love story, they will come! haha…

    Bridesmaids is aimed at Adults.

  • Faust

    stetsons are cool!

  • Brian from Canada

    Hollywood will always chase fashions and trends. But there’s a few key points you’re missing here.

    The Help was a popular novel with a decent cast and trailer dropped in a month that, quite frankly, may be summer but isn’t considered to be one of the blockbuster months — those belong to May and July with June getting in there by default.

    More importantly, it may seek a female audience like Bridesmaids but Bridesmaids was the only raunchy comedy promising something new: every critic came out of the advanced preview with the same comment — it’s The Hangover redone in another city, no big improvements at all.

    What other comedies have the same level of astonishment? Bad Teacher was unattractive, The Change-Up was something we’ve already seen before… Bridesmaids was the only big comedy to promote itself as something new.

    And with the rising cost of movies and the lack of development for some franchises, people are choosing to ignore films that aren’t offering anything they feel they have to see.

    X-Men: First Class more successful than Green Lantern? Sign one was Blake Lively’s agent praising Gossip Girl for protecting his client from that mess well before the film’s release. Sign two was the first trailer, which turned people off with its overdone CGI. Sign three was the untested lead actor for a superhero film combined with a lack of build up with other movies. Sign four was the general lack of pre-film information by WB so that nobody (outside of comic fans and those who watched Super Friends) knew what GL was about.

    Whereas X-Men was built on four previous films. Satisfied fan worries by bringing Bryan Singer on as producer. Pushed the sixties aesthetic which is in right now in Hollywood (Mad Men being copied by network’s Playboy Club and Pan Am). And when the film came out, critics adored the fact that this film had a tight story that made it a worthwhile addition to the franchise.

    Smurfs is not a random event; it’s a well-known franchise with adults that does what every other successful family film does — gets the parents to bring their kids. Chipmunks did the same thing. Mr. Popper’s Penguins should have done the same thing too, except that most adults forgot the book and the film changed too much to play to the cutesy side of Jim Carrey.

    As for Cowboys & Aliens, going into the summer it was defined here as the movie which will either be a huge success or a huge flop. But it spoiled a lot in the trailers, is built around a weak genre (Westerns), had nothing to interest teens — too serious a story based on the trailers — and came too late in the summer. I can guarantee it will do better on television and appreciate with age.

    Finally, Transformers and Thor were guaranteed pay offs because they were in the hottest slots of the summer. Harry Potter was a guaranteed pay off because it closed the biggest franchise in movie history.

    If other big sequels didn’t pan out, it’s because the sequels themselves failed to excite audiences. Pirates Of The Caribbean was been there, done that; Fast Five was not, adding in The Rock and Rio to the mix, which turned out to be quite a good heist film and addition to the franchise. 

    What really needs to change in Hollywood is the expectation of huge returns on every single film they spend a fortune on — and worse, the press has to stop identifying the blockbusters as dismal failures and surprise successes because those aren’t realistic comments either. (Okay, GL deserves to be called a failure, but still… not in its first weekend!)

    What really needs to change in Hollywood is to stop flinging release dates without scripts — and stop looking at fanboy anticipation as the sign to release it either. Tron and Green Lantern are two fantastic examples of films that needed more script work; GI Joe was rushed to production by deadlines and it shows.

    Hollywood needs to made 3D worth it. Period.

    Finally, Hollywood needs to rethink how to promote a movie. GL’s trailer sucks. Footloose’s trailer makes every person who’s seen the original immediately ask “Why?” M:I4′s trailer shows you too much, while Sherlock Holmes’ trailer shows you hints that this really will be a big case for Holmes on top of all the action.

    And The Muppets… well, everyone who’s seen the second trailer knows that they are trying to hit on all the right nostalgia moments early to assure parents and other fans that this will be classic Muppets, not a mis-step plot like Muppets From Space.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_IVXIUGIJKB5JCUGORJZTTUKVI4 Chachi

    Yeah, because they should see something by Spike Lee or Tyler Perry, the masters of oversimplified stereotypes in movies…

  • kalorama

    “Who really thought that X-Men: First Class would be more successful than Green Lantern?”

    I did. I said before either one was released that XM:FC had a better chance of succeeding and that GL had a better chance of being a train wreck.

  • Evil_s2003

    Stop doing worthless remakes and reboots, give us something different for a change, it’s sad that Cowboys & Aliens was ‘a flop’ when it was one of the more entertaining movies out this summer. 

  • Shaun

    “Who really thought that X-Men: First Class would be more successful than Green Lantern? Who expected Cowboys and Aliens to flame out quite as badly as it did? Who really thought that The Hangover Part 2 would be nothing more than a more expensive retread of The Hangover? ”

    Actually *I* thought all three of those things (the previews for GL and C&A both sucked), and as a result I didn’t see GL, or  C&A, or Hangover 2. There were plenty of good movies to choose from this summer.

    “With the exception of Transformers and, to a lesser extent, Thor, this summer was the one where sure things didn’t necessarily pay off; ”

    Oh c’mon Graeme… No mention of the most “sure thing” of them all? HARRY POTTER! Which, by the way, is the #1 movie of the year now, topping even (thank goodness) Transformers 3. Give the wizard his due, please.

  • Shaun

    $81 million after 3 weeks (according to Box Office Mojo) and dropping like a rock. That’s way below expectations. Given that it barely beat out the freakin’ Smurfson its opening weekend, got mostly terrible reviews and has (domestically) only made back about half of its budget (“Mojo” says the budeget was $183 million) I’d call it a bomb. It might not even crack $100 mil in the U.S.

    Put it this way… Planet of the Apes cracked $100 mil after last weekend (its second week out), the Smurfs (which opened the same weekend as C & A) is over $100 mil, and Captain America (which has only been out one week longer) has taken in almost double what C & A has made.

  • Shaun

    Also consider that DVD/Blu-Ray/downloads, etc., are probably just as big deal to movie studios now as the actual box office. First Class will end up making a profit, and the generally good reviews and audience repsonse has made a sequel pretty likely.

  • Shaun

    I meant to say there were plenty of OTHER good movies to choose from this summer. Thor, X-Men, Super 8, Midnight In Paris, Harry Potter (which I saw twice), Captain America, and Planet of the Apes were all either good or great.

  • http://twitter.com/daniel_ch_moran Daniel Chavez Moran

    Hollywood being so safe is very aggravating.

  • MalReyn

    i know this was 5 days ago, but i just opened my browser and this popped up…

    i was speaking more in terms of buzz and reception than sales in this case. i know plenty of people that saw it, but when the first one came out people were all “you gotta see it! it’s sooo funny!” where with this one, at least with the people i know that saw it, the reaction was more of “ha… eh.”