Star Wars Getting Re-Edited Again? Good!

  • 135 Comments
 
<i>Star Wars</i> Getting Re-Edited Again? Good!  

George Lucas didn’t rape my childhood. With all the furor and outrage over even more changes being made to the Star Wars movies for the Blu-ray editions, I know that I’m supposed to get all upset again that the movies are being taken even further away from the originals, but… I just can’t be bothered. No, even worse than that: I’m not sure I fully understand why people are getting upset about it.

The latest changes, in particular, are pretty ridiculous to get bothered by: Some rocks have been CGI-ed in front of R2D2! There are more TIE fighters in a space battle! Obi-Wan is making a different unintelligible noise to scare off the sand people! So what? None of these things really change any of the actual story or performances from the movies. I can understand people getting upset about whether Han or Greedo shoots first, because that does change a character moment (Not to mention establish that Greedo is a very, very bad shot), but everything else…? They’re really, really cosmetic changes. To get upset about them, I think, suggests a “can’t see the forest for the trees” mentality a little bit.

After all, which is more important: The experience of watching the movie, or the movie remaining exactly as it did when you initially saw it? There’s been a certain fetishization of the Star Wars movies in their original forms, as if the original trilogy was somehow perfect when it was first released and somehow holy and unchangeable – and that’s very definitely not the case. Yes, the movies were a lot of fun, and yes, the slight shabbiness of certain things within the movies is definitely part of the charm, but… What really makes the movie work is the central story and the performances of the main actors, and both those things survive any and all amount of re-edits and special effects upgrades. Every time I see people complain about the movies being “ruined” with all the tinkering, I always wonder whether or not it was actually the movie they loved, or a very specific idea of the movie that they want to impose upon the world.

The odd thing is, in some perverse way, I think that it’s good that Lucas keeps changing things up. There’s something oddly reassuring about the fact that he keeps on trying to “improve” the movies, bring them closer to some platonic ideal of Star Wars that he keeps in his head, for me; some weird “He cares! It’s not just something that he walked away from when he was rich!” Does that make sense? It would have been easy enough for him to just release DVDs, BluRays and whatever and keep the cash flowing in that way, but he keeps the movies evolving, even though it pisses off the hardcore and cuts off that particular revenue stream (If Lucas was really just being mercenary, he’d release the original versions of the movies on BluRay as well; that he doesn’t says to me that he’s still invested in Star Wars as his story, for better or worse). Even if you don’t like the changes he’s making, surely there’s still something admirable in that…?

I have the feeling that I am, surprisingly even to myself, in favor of all the edits and special editions and redos, when it comes to Star Wars. I may not be that invested in seeing them, and I may wish that Lucas would just make a new movie instead of tinkering with his old ones, but… I don’t know. Despite myself, I like the idea of Lucas obsessed with “perfecting” his movies, even if the audience wants him to move on. There’s something in that that speaks to the idea of his being an “artist,” instead of a hack.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_HRQDHAIBMPN5V3KHKETMZQDZIU Jacob

    “He cares! It’s not just something that he walked away from when he was rich!” 
    if you have watched the prequel trilogy you can see he doesn’t care about star wars and he’s just in it for the money.  90% of the changes he has made are retarded and not needed, cgi yoda in phantom is a good change cuz he looked like crap in that one.  keep in mind that george will contradict anything he has said and does it quite often so when he says he loves star wars think twice.  he owns them so he basically gets all the money son, why do you think he want’s to keep making indy movies???  he get’s i believe 30% of revenue from the films, that being said that skull movie made $786,636,033.  he’s all about the benjamins…just saying.

  • Anonymous

    The saddest part to any satire is how easily it’s lost on so many. 

  • http://twitter.com/Andrewmated Andrew Mathieu

    Amen to this article.

  • Lead_sharp

    You cared enough to make a none comment. Now either your laying out flame bait (chomp chomp chomp) or simply take pleasure in watching people argue because you, like us have fuck all else to do on a Monday night. 

    This thread is a debate, it means something to the people on it, the flamers, the trolls and the geeks all vieing to make their points as valid as possible. So a geek site is not really the venue to stand up and say ‘I don’t care about this’ because it just kinda makes you look like the biggest cock at the orgy. 

  • Lead_sharp

    And as if this needed to be added…

    http://redlettermedia.com/plinkett/star-wars/

  • Franco

    If he was just re-editing to fix effects that looked primitive in the original movies- like removing the outlines from blue-screen footage- then nobody would complain. It’s because he uses the opportunity to make crass changes like Greedo shooting first, or Darth Vader bellowing ‘Noooooo’, that fans get outraged. Han Solo shooting Greedo under the table was not only a classic scene in it’s original form (and nodded to in Raiders of the Lost Ark when Jones shoots a mad swordsman), it introduces us to Han as a rogue and tells us that he can be dangerous. The re-edited scene not only diminishes Han, but it’s clumsy- despite state of the art effects, it looks shoddy and so obviously tacked on. Again, Vader choosing between his son and his master was powerful in it’s silence. Now, Lucas can ‘use new technology to realise my vision’ and dub on a ‘Nooooooo!’ which will no doubt turn it into a Simpsons-like howler of a scene.

  • Bob

    If Lucas wants tinker with his films, I wouldn’t have a problem with it – if he would keep the theatrical versions available for purchase.

  • Mmorris17

    if you don’t mind the changes then you simply aren’t a true fan, plain and simple. 

  • Mmorris17

    yes. I actually have the set that came out a couple years after they did the 1st dvd set that contained only the new versions and it actually had both movies in it so i’m pretty happy that I dont have to see hayden christensen at the end of jedi or the crappy sped up minor head tilt han did when greedo fires first. Maybe they will do that with the blue rays but if not at least I have the originals in a watchable format.

  • Jmcreer

    So true : (

  • Cjorg2

    Still cheaper on DVD, and you can still get the unaltered versions on that format as well.  Like it was already stated.  Sounds like you’re still making excuses

  • Cjorg2

    All the original versions are available on DVD without the added scenes and CGI.  It’s commonsense not BS

  • Cjorg2

    OR…
    … you are a true fan, but have a life.

  • Anonymous

    “Biggest cock at the orgy”, eh? That’s rich coming from a guy who a) wears odd coloured glass on his face, and b) doesn’t get what I’m saying in the first place.Yes, I’m on a site adding to a debate because I believe something – that these are JUST films… films that I don’t understand why people who are probably old enough to know better are getting so heated about. Really, why? As this is the third time Lucas has released the films amended why is this such a surprise and point of anger for everyone? If anyone is the ”biggest cock at the orgy”, surely it is Lucas. He must be laughing his arse off over all the vitriol on sites like these because he sure as hell doesn’t take any notice of the fans. If he did he would have left well enough alone after the first misguided tweaking of the films, wouldn’t he? But he hasn’t ergo he doesn’t care so why should we? To him, these films are simply a pension fund; to me, they have become just films because their creator deserves no more from me.

    So in answer to your accusations: no, I’m not some troll throwing flame bait (whatever the hell that means because it certainly isn’t in Chambers English Dictionary!), and yes, I do have more to do on a Monday night but because of iPhone technology I’m able to enjoy a night out with real people while adding to the debate.

    For my money, these films stopped being Star Wars after the end credits of Return of the Jedi. Satisfied now?

  • Jmcreer

    I was waiting for some idiot to make a silly, stupid statement like this.  I’m surprised it took this long.  Congratulations.

    I saw all films back in the 70′s and 80′s several times at the cinema, as well as when they were re-released in the 90′s with my son.
    Back in the 70′s my brother and I once got busted by K-Mart security for “smuggling” Chewbacca out of the store in our shorts (I learned the error of my ways)
    I’ve got the original movies that I taped off the TV in the 80′s.
    I’ve got an audio-tape from the 80′s as well.
    I’ve got both the DVDs you’ve previously mentioned AND the original on Video.
    I’ve got Star Wars t-shirts, toys, books, cups, glasses, and comics.
    I’ll get the Bluray when it comes out on sale, and the changes by and large don’t bother me.  I’ll enthusiastically watch and rewatch the originals and updated versions as I’ve always done.

    But of course, you apparently are the only “true” fan out there. 

  • Haliwood1

    You know, I read through the comments.  And anyone who has a problem with the way Lucas has made changes to the original releases, I understand where you’re coming from.  However, to me, the changes aren’t that big of a deal.  If you really want to discuss what’s worse, Darth Vader screaming “NOooooooo” in a near laughable fashion, or a well-trained army that loses to completely inferior forces on the moon of Endor, I’ll tell you I choose the latter.  I’ll even state a case why even Jar Jar himself isn’t as much of a mockery as how the “Bad Ass” Han Solo became a campy shell of himself in Return of the Jedi. 

    Debate for the sake of fun, exchanging ideas and points of view, are all great, so long as they remain whey there should be.  When people take things so seriously as to insult others who don’t share the same point of view, or, worse yet, the man who created the films that you enjoyed so much when you saw them that you collected those movies, and other items, that are on your shelf, just because he’s decided he doesn’t like how a scene played out, and wanted to try something different with his creation…you need to step away for a moment, and rethink your priorities.  Heavens forbid you start sounding like a sports fan (which I am).  There’s never a valid reason to let a good discussion dissolve into name calling…unless, of course, someone is trying to tell you that George Lucas is the greatest writer of romantic dialogue in a Sci-Fi film, which is just laughable. 

    Again, if you want to discuss who’s the bigger whiner, semi-adult Anakin Skywalker, or stuck on the farm Luke Skywalker…or why you think it matters who shot first…or how thankful we all should be Lucas didn’t add more dialog when Vader grabbed the Emperor, like, “This is for Luke, and Padme, and Mace Windu, and all of the Jedi you slew or had me slay at your insistance!  Heck, you tell him to kill me to take my spot…in front of me?”…I think it’s cool to discuss any and all of Star Wars.  Just…leave the insults off.  Unless they’re from the movies, which means they’d be quotes.  Scruffy Nerf Herders.  :)

  • Vegetable Lasagna

    When I saw the headline, I knew this was a McMillan article.

    That’s all you’re good for, boy – cheap traffic hits. Keep it up.

  • Cjorg2

    My sympathies on the huge target you have just painted on your forehead.  Good luck.

  • Cjorg2

    “it just kinda makes you look like the biggest cock at the orgy.”

    Something to live up to IMO.

  • Whoiseyevan

    The only problem I ever had with any of the re-edits was when the holographic Palpatine head in Empire was replaced with a smaller, saga-accurate head. By making the head smaller, the emotion of the scene was drastically altered. Where as in the original, Vader was talking with an overbearing, disembodied head, much like in the Wizard of Oz, now he is talking with something smaller and hardly menacing. The size is important because it communicates that Vader is insignificant to the Emperor, in spite of how much Vader “looks up” to Palpatine. That’s Film 101 stuff.

  • Anonymous

    And what happens in 15 years when DVD-compatible players are not the norm for home viewing?  The argument goes beyond what’s available for the current generation.  Eventually, the original versions of the films will be unplayable to the general public and the real work that all the FX artists and puppeteers involved in the original trilogy will be sealed away in vaults, because you know eventually, every conventional FX shot in the OT is going to be replaced by CGI in an effort to justify re-releases and keep making money.

  • Who Dat Ninja

    My earliest memory is seeing star wars in the theater in the 70s. Have every release of the film including laser discs. I have no problem with the improvements and am pretty sick of the pure hatred the fanboys spew all over the net. A opinion is one thing but the utter disgust is just plain weird. So the ewoks blink instead of looking like they have eyes ripped off of a store bought toy. Big deal. So Han shot at the same time instead of first, kinda lame but not enough to make me want to hurt myself or others. More spaceships and special effects flourishes? Cool. Of course if Lucas didn’t make changes that inspired hours of screaming and crying how would fans fill their sad, sad lives? Flame on now angry mob, your anger will have no impact on my planning to buy the new blu set next as soon as it
    hits the shelf.

  • http://grantbridgestreet.blogspot.com/ Joe Bloke

    it may not matter to a lot of people, but, you know what? it matters to me.  what if they changed the song in Casablanca? would that matter? or what if they coloured in The Postman Always Rings Twice? would that be ok?  leave the films alone, they were fine as they were, or better still: why not pour all that effort into making something OTHER than YET ANOTHER Star Wars film?  Lucas’ tinkering with the films, despite what he would like to have us all believe, has nothing to do with “perfecting” or “making better” the originals, and everything to do with rinsing the living daylights out of the pockets of his fans. 

    George Lucas is not God, he’s a one-note hack businessman who hasn’t had a single decent idea in the last 30-odd years.

    & before anyone shoots me down for not being a fan, or being some kind of heretic, I’m fortyeight years old, and the first Star Wars film is still one of my favourite films of all time.

  • http://atocom.blogspot.com Atomic Kommie Comics

    Unfortunately, tech becomes obsolete and not everything from the previous generation gets updated.
    I had a kool Star Wars screensaver from Delrina. Art, schematics, animation, sound fx, music, the works.
    It’s on 3.5 floppies. They never even put it on CD, nor did they upgrade it to use on systems post-1995.  As a result, I have an old PowerMac 9600 (with a floppy drive) just to run System 8 programs that don’t exist today.
    Lots of material on vinyl still isn’t digitized.
    Lots of films and tv shows on VHS still aren’t on DVD or BluRay (and probably never will be)

  • John

    What of Vader now saying “No” and then yelling “Nooo” while throwing the emperor? Does that not change the dynamic of that scene on some level? Was it a needed change? Did it add to the movie? Did it take away from the scene?

    The examples you listed all either add nothing but take nothing…. or they add to a scene. The Vader one is just lame.

  • Bgh001

    I quite agree… Ridley Scott has expressed similar opinions about several of his works, Blade Runner included. Stephen King has done much the same with The Stand and Dark Tower and i suspect that someday Peter Jackson will do the same with LOTR!

  • Cforshaw67220

    Any change to a film that has been released is perfectly fine so long as it meets three criterion:

    (1) It isn’t a shameless exploitation of something people have grown to love by adding cosmetic changes to something that didn’t need them to be successful in the first place.

    (2) You don’t do it again, and again, and again, over a short period of time, essentially making every version of the film cheaper and more disposable because it is no longer a single definitive vision, but a skitzophrenic mess that seems less and less like the ideal the director once had.

    (3) It isn’t by the person who said adding colour to black and white films removed something essential from them.

    Lucas meets all three criterion because, (1) ‘Star Wars’ has become less and less a series of films, and instead now inhabits the same place as shows like ‘Pokemon’ or ‘Transformers’ – that is, it is first and foremost an advert which allows various products to be sold through associations with them to children. Whether you agree with this being a good thing or a bad thing is your call, but you cannot claim your work to be performance art when it consists of you making lude comments to prospectives customers on a street corners; (2) ‘Star Wars’ has seen changes made to it when it was first released (as originally, there was no, “Episode 4 – A New Hope” on the original credits), then when rereleased on video (the special editions), before further changes to the DVD releases, and now again for the Blu-Ray, and we have to expect that there will be even greater changes to the original trilogy for 3D. This has essentially devalued the original trilogy as a stand-alone work, without mentioning that the inferior prequel trilogy (which could do with a lot of changes) has been left largely alone; finally, (3) just shows the double standard within the film industry, best highlighted by Richard E. Grant’s pitch to Tim Robbins in ‘The Player’, and the film made from that pitch. I don’t blame George Lucas for selling out (even Alec Guinness was grateful for the money, as it allowed him to pick and choose his projects in future), or trashing a rather silly premise by dilluting the few things that really made it seem cool, but I do think that if you have been the poster boy for a particular campaign, to then forget all about it and do the exact opposite of it to your own fans is, well, a bit of a bad move.

    That said, the position of the above article is still nerd-baiting of the highest order. Had it been posted beneath an announcement for the new Blu-Rays, you would have rightly been called a troll.

  • Cjorg2

    My Bluray plays DVD movies.  Mine must be the only one then : P

  • http://twitter.com/TheRealJayNasty Jonathan Nathan

    In horrible quality, yeah, I guess. I mean, it sort of counts. But you don’t have a good-quality release. You have a release that was just taken straight from a crappy laserdisc.

  • Mechwarrior2k3

    i personally dont have a problem with more ships or some added rocks it is the nooooo they are adding. it is like they are toning down one of the greatest villains of all time but it aint just this it is Lucas rewriting the entire universe for one, the added lines to the movies for 2 and all the focus on the clone wars for three. I am sick of the clone wars now i want to know what happened after the death star went bye bye(yes i have read some of the books but the empire did not fall overnight) or what happened before the movies. The only people doing it differently is the created of the Old republic the video game, and some comics. They need to take their ques from them.

  • Tyrell Archer

    I recently saw a clip of the Vader “NOOOOO!” scene and… I liked it.  It follows Lucas’ philosophy of repeating themes and bringing things full circle (re: the “NOOOO” at the end of ROTS).  The other changes are cosmetic and really are fine tunings that I’m looking forward to seeing.

  • Kris R.

    I adore the movies, but this controversy is exactly why I LOVE Star Wars comics from Dark Horse and the books from Del Rey.

  • Seamuskeaneart

    I couldn’t disagree more. As an artist (im a painter and not a movie maker , but an artist so im goin to chim in) one of the things about been an artist , a real artist, is knowing when a piece is done, you could tinker forever with a drawing/painting/print, but been an artist mean making decisions and taking a step back and saying “yes, this piece is done”. George doesnt do this. Imagine id de’vinci keept going back an messing with the mona lisa, or if michealangelo kept chipping away at david, no, an artist knows when enough is enough.
    also, a real artist strives for the next piece,to move forward, to learn and grow in their field. Lucas hasnt done either of these things, he had one hit, one massive hit and then nothing. Howard the Duck, Willow, awful. if he wanted to improve his work he should start with his failures, not his success.
    I also dont like this Idea of “if you dont like it, dont buy it.” Im sorry, am I wrong to want the original film, as I fell in love with them, presented in the best possible quality? I dont think I am. If he wants to tinker and play with his movie, then let him, but he should also release the originals/ as the were origanally cut and present them in the best quality for the fans of the originals. If he really did give a damn for the fans then this is what he would do.

    But thats just my two cents.

  • Rick Diehl

    Continually re-editing films is normally a bad thing, and in my experience has never once resulted in a movie being improved by these additions.

    Star Wars, the film that came out in 1977 was brilliant. 

    Fun to look at, enjoyable story and likable cast.

    The sequel, The Empire Strike Back was also pretty good, but after that film, Lucas gave up on story and decided that effects were all that matters. So, I gave up on Star Wars in the middle of the third film, and only watched the first of the new trilogy before giving up in total boredom, right about the time baby Darth wins the space chariot race. 

    But my issues were not that the special effects weren’t “special” enough, it’s that the characters on the screen were increasingly dull and uninspired and that the story was predictable and really dull.

    Then again, I guess that is a problem that Lucas can’t fix with any amount of new effects and shiny lights.

  • Irondarkknight

    when someones is already holding a gun on you and telling u that he intends to kill you its still self defence reguardless if greedo shot first or not