10 More Movies We Want To See Make A 3D Comeback

  • 68 Comments
 
10 More Movies We Want To See Make A 3D Comeback  

The Lion King? Star Wars? Titanic? Top Gun? It seems as if the new thing for Hollywood is to take an old movie, turn it into 3D and re-release it in theaters for a whole new audience to… I don’t know, pay for. But why stop with those movies? Here are ten more movies that demand a 3D revival.

Terminator 2: Judgment Day
3D works best, I think, for big action movies that are unafraid to go completely over the top in terms of explosions, special effects and eye candy. No surprise, then, that I’m convinced that James Cameron’s second Terminator movie – which fits that bill so completely that it could almost have been created for that very purpose – would be an ideal candidate for translating into 3D. And if Cameron, who masterminded the format’s highpoint, Avatar, was involved in taking it beyond the 2D version it is now…? All the better.

2001: A Space Odyssey
Of course, if you’re not going to use 3D for explosions and life-and-death stakes, then why not use it for one of cinema’s most well-known pieces of science fiction psychedelia? Even before the end-of-movie colorful freakout, there’s a lot of Stanley Kubrick’s 1968 masterpiece that would appreciate the chance to stretch into a different visual dimension (the scenes aboard the PanAm Space Plane, introducing the future, in particular, could look wonderful in 3D), but let’s face it: That final sequence, as Dave transcends existence as we know it thanks to the Monolith would blow your mind in 3D.

Fantasia
Don’t get me wrong, I know that The Lion King is a guaranteed Disney moneymaker to translate into 3D, but if there’s one animated Disney movie that needs to be in 3D, it’s Fantasia, with its different styles and more experimental moments. It’s one thing to see Timon and Pumbaa monkey around right in front of your eyes, but wouldn’t it be much more impressive to see “The Rite of Spring” offer up 3D dinosaurs and the evolution of life on Earth? Exactly.

Alien
Six words: John. Hurt’s. Chest. Monster. In. 3D. Okay, some more words: 3D could add a lot to the claustrophobic experience of the first movie in the long-running monster movie cycle, not just in emphasizing the Nostromo as an environment, but also the enormous cavern where the alien’s eggs are initially discovered. But, really, it’s just about the idea of watching an alien burst through John Hurt’s chest in 3D. Can you really blame me?

Blade Runner
And talking of Ridley Scott, his 1982 masterpiece was almost as successful as an immersive visual experience as it was a narrative noir tale, and that’s something that could only be improved by a smart, subtle use of 3D. Imagine a movie that didn’t feel the need to beat you over the head with its use of 3D, but instead used it very sparingly, making each use – The famous scene where the car flies past the giant advertising screen, for example – that much more impactful. Also, it’s not as if anyone involved with Blade Runner would be that upset with the idea of creating yet another new version…

The Matrix
If nothing else, The Matrix was an astonishing movie from a visual effects standpoint. How much more of an overwhelming experience could it be if 3D was introduced into the mix? Bullet-time scenes would get more intense, the weird-green-binary-code visuals could become more ridiculous, and we could finally feel as if Lawrence Fishburne is offering us the red or blue pills.

Total Recall
There are many, many Arnold movies that could have gone on this list – There’s already another one on here – but one scene in particular won Total Recall‘s place on here: Where the old woman’s head splits open to reveal Arnold underneath. Sure, it’d be fun to see Arnold almost explode from the lack of atmosphere in 3 dimensions as well, and who wouldn’t want to see his 3D x-ray run across the screen, but for some reason, that scene where the head splits open is something that I really, really have to see in 3D at some point. Please?

Back To The Future Part II
Yes, the first film is better. But it’s the second installment, when Marty and Doc head to a particularly gimmick-filled future, complete with floating hoverboards and holographic sharks jumping from movie theaters, that would be best-positioned to take advantage of the 3D format. And, let’s be honest, there would be something oddly thematically fitting, in a goofy way, in having the “future” be in 3D as opposed to the trips to the past – although allowing Doc and Marty revisit their own pasts in 3D as they snake back through the events of the first film could be well worth watching, as well.

E.T. The Extra Terrestrial
It’s not an action movie as such, but there’s something about Steven Spielberg’s E.T. that feels that it would work in 3D. Maybe it’s because I really want to feel as if that closet full of soft toys is all around me, or maybe it’s that there’s something about the 3D format that feels as if it appeals to children especially, and should therefore be used in what might be one of the best children’s movies ever made. If nothing else, imagine how wonderful the scene where Elliot and E.T. fly in front of the moon could be in 3D.

Raiders of The Lost Ark
If there was ever any scene in cinema history that was made for 3D without even the director realizing it, it’s the giant rock rolling down the hill and Indiana Jones running from it. Never mind the many other moments that would also work in 3D (The airplane circling above Indy and the Nazi as they fight? The spirits released from the Ark at the climax? Come on), just close your eyes and imagine how wonderful and just plain right it would be to see that rock almost crush Indiana as he runs out towards us in three dimensions.

…That’s my ten. But which movies have I missed? Use the comments to make your case for which movies would be helped by gaining an extra dimension, and keep your fingers crossed that someone in Hollywood is paying attention.

  • Omitterati

    When has anyone watched a ’2D’ movie and gone “Oh my God! Where’s the depth! I can’t perceive any depth in this film!”? Precisely. Never. ’2D’ movies are and always have been seen in ’3D’ All this View-Master shit is an expensive, utter waste-of-time.

  • Troy

    after about half an hour, my eyes adjust to it and i don’t even notice it’s in 3D anymore. if people in the 50s had to pay extra for colour movies that, part way through, would revert to black and white, then yes, i’m sure they would have whinged their faces off

  • zela

    Thad; J2 said “Animated movies can be turned into 3D “. So it appears he’s talking about a 2D to 3D conversion not 3D to an improved(?) 3D; basically post production. I personally don’t think much of post production, which is what this blog is about,  and  will avoid them whenever they occur in the future.

    Now Real 3D is something else. Just watched Monsters vs Aliens 3d and it was spectacular. It is, in my opinion, “the best” 3D I’ve seen so far with characters and objects projected into the room and great depth of field as well. I first saw the movie in 2D blu ray when it originally came out  and was quite disappointed but in 3D it was an entirely different movie. Suddenly the characters and action came to life and the dialogue seemed to have more meaning. The addition of a great Dolby soundtrack combined to make it a really great viewing experience.

    I hope the Motion Picture Industry makes many more of these going forward because I will be there to watch each and every one of them.

    zela

  • Dpcoltx

    How about because i like going to the movies, and since our local theater has decided not to carry the 2d versions of the movies I want to see, I am not able to go see the movies.

    Next Nearest theatre is over an hour away.

  • Wildstorm

    So in other words you like to go to boards and complain about people complaining about 3D.  So if you don’t like people bitching about 3D movies then you should go to a 3D movie and not read the boards.

    Also ALL movies are shown on a “nice, flat two-dimensional screen.” 

  • David Davenport

    Mad Max 2 has some potential , from boomerang fingers flying to V8 and tanker driven mayhem

  • Kandor

    Superman I and II

  • Bill_P

    Actually there were people saying color 3D was just a fad.  This was at a time when color shows were rare enough they advertised them as such by adding “In Living Color” to it’s commercials.  Bonanza wasn’t so popular because it was a great show, it was one of the first to be done in color so everyone who bought a color set watched it to get what they paid for.

  • zela

    Not to be argumentative but you can buy glasses on ebay that convert 3D to 2D(in the Theater). Of course you’d still have to pay the 3D price but you’d save the drive.

    zela

  • P_keely

    Well, 2001: A Space Odyssey really doesn’t need to be made in 3D, what an awful, awful time

  • Mark

    Fast Times on Ridgemont High would be even more epic in 3D.

  • Educatexan

    Not everybody gets headaches from 3D.  My roommates and I watch them often and enjoy them thoroughly.  For those of you who do suffer from the headaches: no one is forcing you to watch them in 3D.  They are always available in 2D as well.

    Why is everybody so aghast that differing opinions exist?  It’s as if you demand that everyone in the world be a cookie-cutter copy of yourself.

  • Anonymous

    They are some great listings – Alien, and Raiders of the lost arc especially!

  • Anonymous

    They are some good ones.

    I  never would of thought of Moulin Rouge, But I’d go see it. Chicago would be great too!

  • Anonymous

    Some Horror movies would be great.

    Like the Texas Chainsaw remake and original Nightmare on Elm St.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_PCDEHI7LBNHI4COCT2GBQDI5WE Tony R

    They have been talking as if 3d is the only way you can see these movies, yet every city I go to to see a 3d movie has a 2d option at that multiplex.  The are just mad because they predicted that 3d could not last, yet it did.  All their reasons that no one likes 3d have fallen flat because people are choosing 3d despite the 2d showing across the hall.  They have lost the “no one like 3d” argument.

  • Jfreund 303

    I would like to see a remake of the movie IT hopefully this post sparks something!

  • guest

    i do not want immersive reality goggles cuz 3d gives me a massive headache i take the glasses off and miss some of the movie cuz it hurts the old style glasses didnt do that.and before you start slammin other people put yourself in thier headache we misss parts of a movie we payed a shitload to see because the 3d effect gives us a headache!!!!!!!thats not just whinin asshole!!!!thats us gettin ripped off. !