The Sorkin That Was: Sports Night

  • 4 Comments
 
The Sorkin That Was: <i>Sports Night</i>  

With The Newsroom premiering on HBO this weekend, perhaps it’s time to reminisce over creator Aaron Sorkin’s television career to date. Whether The West Wing or Studio 60, you know what you’re going to get when you watch a Sorkin show: Fast-paced dialogue that mixes the smart snark with an almost overwhelming sincerity. And here’s where it all began: Sports Night.

Sports Night, which ran for two seasons on ABC between 1998 and 2000, is somewhat of an oddity in Sorkin’s career; while it has many of his trademark moves and themes, it differs in format and, in theory, intent, being a half-hour sitcom instead of an hour-long drama. Certainly, at launch, it embraced the sitcom format fairly strongly; not only were plots more pared-down and straight-forward than what they’d become by the end of the first season – and certainly more than they’d end up in the second – but there was even a laugh track throughout the first year to remind everyone where the jokes were (Tellingly, the laugh track went down in volume and usage throughout that first season, as if Sorkin, the producers or the network were slowly realizing, “Yeah, this isn’t that kind of show after all”).

Like so many Sorkin projects, Sports Night has a love story at its heart – Two, actually; the screwball-comedy-influenced flirting/relationship between sports anchor Casey McCall and his producer Dana Whitaker, and the more neurotic, more straight-forward relationship between two associate producers, Natalie Hurley and Jeremy Goodwin. The workplace romance obsession of Sorkin’s was given full play in Sports Night, with the romantic troubles of Casey’s co-anchor and best friend Dan Rydell also mixed into everything. Perhaps because of the more obvious unreality of the show – Unlike, say, Studio 60, Sports Night stays away from weightier subjects and pronouncements about society and the media’s role in its coarsening for the most part, preferring something much lighter and intentionally throwaway – this kind of thing works better here than in West Wing or Studio 60, but if your taste in Sorkin runs away from his schtickier side, this likely isn’t the show for you.

What it is, however, is the show in which you can see Sorkin turn into “that guy who wrote the West Wing” before your very eyes. It happens mostly in the second season – which ran concurrently with the first season of West Wing on NBC – as the show drifts away from the sitcom format more and more, and Sorkin gets both more serious and more… angry, perhaps…? Certainly less willing to suffer fools gladly, as the show starts dealing with heavier topics and the behind-the-scenes wheeling and dealing of the television industry. It’s not just the mix of comedy and drama that made The West Wing so compelling that you can see Sorkin perfect as this show winds down; there’re also the origins of the self-referential qualities that made Studio 60 so frustrating and, ultimately, alienating to the majority of viewers here, as Sorkin found himself becoming more entrenched in the “entertainment industry” and it began to overwhelm his judgment (Note to television makers: Most people really aren’t that interested in the behind-the-scenes stories of what it takes to put a show together unless you include some kind of hook that they can relate to).

Sports Night, then; the work of a younger Sorkin who comes into the height of his powers as you watch, but also starts to sow the seeds of his downfall at pretty much the same time. It’s not the greatest show you’ll ever see, but if you’re a Sorkin fan who’s never checked it out, it’s more than worth your time.

Sports Night is available on DVD, iTunes and Netflix Watch Instantly, for those who want to check it out.

  • Sorkin Rocks

    What downfall?  Sorkin has yet to make a bad show.  Studio 60 was fantastic and 30 Rock is a piece of crap, but NBC stuck with 30 Rock because it featured so many people with ties to the network.  Too many people didn’t get what they expected out of Studio 60 so they trashed it instead of appreciating it for what it was–NOT The West Wing and NOT Sports Night but a natural progression from both.  Sorkin’s only mistake was putting it on network tv.  That’s something you put on HBO and use to rip the major networks to shreds…which is apparently the lesson he learned, hence The Newsroom.

  • http://twitter.com/Rick_Bullard Rick Bullard

    Downfall? What?!?
    Personally I think Sports NIght is his BEST show. I watch it from beginning to end at least twice a year and it’s his most consistent show. Especially once they get rid of that damn laugh track. If a joke is funny or not the network doesn’t need to to tell it’s audience WHEN to laugh. 

    It also has fewer wince inducing moments than any  of his other shows. “Way to be at your desk kid” From Issac & Ishmael S3 of The West Wing? Ugh.”They beat their WOMEN!” From The Women of Qumar S3?  and speaking of wince inducing Studio 60 is supposed to be a comedy sketch show but the comedy sketches weren’t funny. Not even remotely. At least The West Wing (during Sorkin’s run S1-4) had more solid stand out episodes (Bartlett for America, 18th and Potomac, 17 People,)  Especially during the first three seasons.

    Here’s hoping that the Newsroom is closer to Sports Night than Studio 60.  

  • Jim H.

    I’m going to join the “what downfall??” train here and say that even though Studio 60 might have been a commercial failure (I personally thought it was awesome), I think a man who has a highly anticipated new show about to start and who also won an Academy Award for Best Screenplay last year and was nominated for one in the same category again this year can hardly be said to have suffered a downfall.

  • Sorkin Rocks

     Studio 60 the show was not about the comedy sketches on a sketch show called Studio 60.  It was about what goes on behind the scenes at a comedy sketch show called Studio 60.  And actually, some of them were funny, but that just wasn’t the point of the show Sorkin was making.  It was NBC’s dumb move to market it that way so when people watched both Studio 60 and 30 Rock, they were confused as to why one was joke-filled and one was occasionally actually funny. 

    I don’t know if that’s what you meant.  It’s difficult to know if you’re talking about Sorkin’s Studio 60 or Matt and Danny’s Studio 60.