How Much Olympics Is Too Much? Ask NBC

  • 16 Comments
 
How Much Olympics Is Too Much? Ask NBC  

I am not a sports buff. Let’s get that out of the way first; I rarely watch sports, and my thrice-weekly trips to the gym are the closest I get to the kind of physical exertion necessary to actually play a sport. And yet, I’ve been sucked in by this year’s Summer Olympics. There’s just one problem: NBC clearly doesn’t want me to check out their coverage of it on television, for some reason.

My problem isn’t the inane commentary or having results spoiled by trailers less than ten minutes before events are actually shown on the network; I’ll leave those for other people (And there certainly are plenty of them, judging by the things I’ve seen on social media up until this point). No, my problem with NBC’s coverage is this: There is far too much of it.

No, wait, even that’s not right. After all, I know that there are literally millions of people who’re tuning into the broadcasts night after night, giving NBC some of its best ratings in years, so it’s clearly just me that’s feeling overwhelmed by the sheer volume of Olympics on the network. But overwhelmed I am, and it’s because NBC expects you to apparently commit your entire evening to catching up with the event. Tonight, for example, the “highlights” show lasts four hours – which is, on the plus side, an hour less than Sunday’s round-up.

Here’s the thing: I want to see some of this stuff, I do. But I don’t want to see four hours of this stuff, and NBC doesn’t really tell you when anything in particular is going to be on; instead, everything is either happening or it’s “coming up,” and the viewer is just expected to stick around and sit through everything up to that point. Now, sometimes that can lead to some unexpectedly enjoyable viewing – I found myself loving the synchronized diving on Sunday night, getting upset at what my wife and I decided was entirely unfair scoring against the American pair and wondering whether the Canadian team had some kind of pheromone power that gave them higher marks than they seemed to deserve – but other times, it means that you’re having to deal with a lot of dull commentary or events that you couldn’t care less about, and all the time, your TiVo is calling to remind you that there are episodes of shows you’d actually want to watch just waiting there, slightly impatiently, for you.

Why, exactly, can’t we have a one hour roundup of all the important stories of the day at the start of each marathon evening session, with each story getting a “We’ll show you more from that event at [Whatever time] tonight,” as a capper? That way, people like me – who are curious, but not overly dedicated, to the Olympics as a whole – can get their fix and know when to tune back in? I understand that the fear on behalf of NBC is likely “But then they’ll not watch the whole thing!” but… Well, if the alternative is “watch the whole four/five hour broadcast” or “not watch anything, but find what I’m looking for on the Internet,” then I hate to break it to them, but I’m going to choose the latter almost every single time. In this day and age, there’s no real reason not to try and cater to the viewer in this kind of situation as much as possible, because, really? If you don’t somebody else will.

And so, because NBC refuses to offer a fast way to get the information I want, I’ll stick with the hilarious Guardian live blog of each day’s events and YouTube for now. I’d prefer to watch it on television, but, not until NBC can come up with a show that asks less of me than a sixth of my day.

  • Theotherbluth

    I can understand your complaints, but I disagree. I’m a huge Olympics fan, and sure,not every event is super exciting, but it’s all about rooting for your country to do well. Like you said,sometimes you find out there are events you wouldn’t have watched otherwise but they captivate you nonetheless. I was wondering the same thing in the diving comp by the way, but it worked out in the end at least.

  • Theotherbluth

    Sorry, but I forgot to mention my disdain for how they spoil events right before they air them. What the hell is up with that? I agree wholeheartedly that this is asinine, I have no idea why NBC doesn’t think this is a stupid practice. I also never go to ESPN or Yahoo.com because the first thing you see on their site is who won what medals.

  • Tenormandess365

    I completely agree.  My wife has the exact same complaint.  My complaint is, on top of that, I don’t care much about the olympics, but any time I turn on my NBC, that’s all I see.  I turn on the local news, reporting from London.  Turn on the national news, reporting from London.  Turn on the Today show, interviews from London.  I have not actually watched any coverage, but only after a few days, I am totally burned out on it.

  • http://sdelmonte.livejournal.com/ Simon DelMonte

    NBC’s coverage is one of the reasons I lost interest in the Olympics.  I miss ABC’s version.

  • http://twitter.com/qnetter Roger B.A. Klorese

    Good grief, it’s once every four years. Suck it up. It’s not like it’s the only channel you get.

  • sandwich eater

    NBC’s coverage is awful.  The interesting thing to me is that things have actually regressed since 4 years ago.  In 2008 I watched the sports I was interested in (tkd and judo, which never airs on TV in the US) live online, but today the livestream is behind a paywall.  Does NBC really think I’m going to subscribe to cable just to stream online coverage of a couple sports every 4 years?

    The commentary really is inane.  I just saw them do a replay of Michael Phelps’s mom’s reaction to him coming in 2nd.  Seriously?

  • Stephail

    I agree. I don’t like how some TV channels during the FIFA World Cups, an event much more limited of content, only cover that information, but I can just change the channel until the few days of the event pass.

  • darthtigris

    Gotta love entitlement …

  • Tim B.

    Might I suggest reading some comics instead?

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/7LJSQWURCL4RWRFE7W7G5VHDQU Bob

    I’ve always hated that sporting events I don’t care about shanghai television for a few weeks.  Letthe people who care click a few times to find what they want.  There’s little enough already I enjoy on TV without losing interest in something because I stop caring during the time they stop showing it…

  • first name Crap, last name Bag

    my problem with NBC’s coverage is how they only focus on the American competitors. In Canada, it is normal for CTV to show, for example, a basketball game between China and Sweden, no Canadians involved. On NBC, I watched a swimming race, where the main concern of the announcers was that if this American girl came in at least 3rd or 4th, she would advance to the next round. During the last lap the cameras zoomed in on her, she made it, the announcers were jubilant. On they went to the next event. There was absolutely no mention of who actually won the race!

  • Kevin Smith

    You think you’ve got a lot of Olympics on TV. Here in Britain, the main TV channel, BBC 1, shows non-stop Olympics all day, except when it breaks for the News, and the sport shifts to BBC 2. BBC 3 is showing Olympics all day as well. Plus, 24 (yes TWENTYFOUR) entirely new channels (duplicated in HD) showing live action in every Olympic sport there is. Four hours – pah!

  • http://twitter.com/JoeKoffee JoeKoffee

    Completely agree! Me? Mostly HATE gymnastics & swimming—cause everyone else loves them.  But I want martial arts & track & field—& WHERE ARE THEY!!??

  • http://twitter.com/StephenMuses Stephen Conway

    The athletics stuff starts next week.

  • sandwich eater

     You’ll be able to watch boxing and tae kwon do on TV (probably on an NBC cable channel). Wrestling may be on TV.  Judo is only showing half an hour of highlights on MSNBC.  I don’t know if they’re showing fencing on TV.

  • RunnerX13

    That’s because USA has one of the biggest teams, and is one of the top competitors.