Did Disney Buy Lucasfilm for The Wrong Reasons?

  • 76 Comments
 
Did Disney Buy Lucasfilm for The Wrong Reasons?  

Thinking about the Disney purchase of Lucasfilm this week – Yeah, like you haven’t been doing the same thing – something odd occurred to me. Disney made a point of clarifying that the entire reason it had made the deal was Star Wars, which makes a lot of sense, but made me wonder: Is Disney spending a lot of money on the wrong thing?

It’s not that Star Wars isn’t going to be a particularly profitable purchase for Disney, because – Well, it’s Star Wars; that’s a particularly valuable thing to own. But it’s also something that’s thirty-five years old. Similarly, Marvel Entertainment, which Disney purchased for $4 billion in 2009, hasn’t really had much success when it comes to creating new characters or intellectual property since… what, Deadpool, perhaps? So that’s twenty years now. I’m not criticizing Disney for either purchase, per se; the success of Marvel’s The Avengers proves that there is both life and profit left in exploiting creations that came about decades earlier, if nothing else, so it makes sense from a business sense. But at the same time, I find myself wondering whether Disney should be looking at aggressively funding creators/companies who are trying to come up with new ideas and stories to tell instead of seemingly concentrating on things we’ve seen since childhood. Nostalgia’s a fine thing and all, but eventually, that well’s going to run dry (Especially in the case of the Lucasfilm scenario; once the audience is bored with Star Wars – and, at a new installment every two to three years, that might happen sooner rather than later – then that $4 billion investment is going to suddenly seem a little moot, especially if Indiana Jones and Willow really are off the table entirely as some have reported).

There’s a temptation, I admit, to point at Pixar and say “Do what they did!” Certainly, Pixar has proven that audiences will embrace new ideas, characters and storylines if they’re good enough, and in doing so have created a whole new generation of exploitable franchises for Disney to take advantage of (Seriously, Toy Story is something that Disney’s merchandise department must be grateful for every single day). Even though the cynic in me has been dismayed by Pixar’s returning to the scene of earlier crimes with the Toy Story and Cars sequels and new Monsters University movie, they’re still alternating those with new characters and stories, which is commendable considering the lucrative temptation of the alternative. Even Disney’s own animation department works on new ideas – Okay, new reworkings of established fairy tales, most of the time – albeit those aimed at a very specific audience (and in a very specific genre space). So why not look for the same qualities in more mainstream fare?

What both Lucasfilm and Marvel needs from Disney, ultimately, is the space and time to fail. Both companies have seemingly been purchased with the intent that they are, for all intents and purposes, plug-and-play profit machines with ready-made IP that the audience doesn’t need to be introduced to, and that’s certainly true to some extent, but both companies also employ extremely talented and creative people who could very possibly come up with something that could resonate as strongly with audiences as that which already exists, if only the pressure wasn’t constantly on them to produce, produce, produce. If Disney could look at both companies as long-term prospects and not just short-term gains, and allow some space (and budget) for research and development into the unfamiliar and original, it’s possible that both companies could end up being so much more for Disney than what it appears to think that it’s actually purchased.

  • Jude

    Yes, I truly believe corporations which toss around billions of dollars should be taking advice from…sorry, who are you again? 

  • Guest 1

    Deadpool was in X-Men Origins: Wolverine? Ohhhh you are talking about that weird mutated Ryan Reynolds thing near the end of the movie, aren’t you? Yeah, that was no where close to who Deadpool really is. No one would’ve watched that movie and walked away saying, “Gee golly, I wonder if that bald mute thing with swords in his arms has a comic book.”

  • Tyler

    This is, easily, the dumbest post I’ve ever read from Graeme.

    And that’s saying a LOT.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Julio-Perez/1314974340 Julio Perez

    I don’t think that this is going to bad at all. Just don’t go overboard like those people at theforce.net. They are too EU extremist and one day they hate GL and te next they love him. Disney will do pretty good with the property the problem  is that this is all new to everyone We don’t really know if it really is going to work or not.

  • Goshogun

    Graeme is a secret WB or Fox stooge,actually jealous that Disney bought Star Wars

  • Lukecage

    Wow.  This article is dumb.  Both companies are cash cows, with tons of history and characters to explore.  Also, they do employ creators, who actually do create.  Like I said, DUMB.

  • Mitch Carpenter

    Disney was built on re-telling stories that were centuries old.  They’re not looking for fresh and innovative; they’re looking for established characters with dedicated fans.  I’m not saying that’s necessarily bad, since Avengers kicked ass, and I fully expect Star Wars VII to be awesome, but that’s just the nature of the beast.  This was all about business, not art.

  • http://www.facebook.com/sally.vandershaf Sally Vandershaf

    Disney bought Lucasfilm for the same reason any corporation does anything: to make money. Disney doesn’t want to invent new charatcers. They want to buy the rights to globally famous characters and then moetize the hell out of them, because that’s a much surer route to vast riches.

    They’ll recast the OT characters with young actors and use their famous names to get audiences to the theater. If they wanted to be original, they wouldn’t have bought an existing brand in the first place. imagine all the original stuff you could make for four billion dollars.

  • http://twitter.com/darceymcl Darcey McLaughlin

    I get what you are saying in this article, but I disagree. If established properties are cared for and well done, the audience will embrace it. Spider-Man has been around for a lot longer than Star Wars and the character remains popular and profitable. Movie goers embraced the last film after a less than stellar outing in the third.

    Star Trek is another great example. It was only a few years ago people were talking about Trek fatigue. But what the last film showed is that if you take an established property and do a good job updating them, they can remain fresh. As long as you don’t allow stuff like Nemesis to happen fans will remain loyal.

    Disney makes few mistakes when it comes to producing quality media. Very few Disney films get poor reviews. There are a few stinkers in there, but they have a proven track record. It’s not so much about nostalgia as taking great characters and doing good movies or shows with it.

    And as far as profit, let’s be quite honest, the money here is in the licensing. Box office profits look good, but licensing is where the dollars are. Take a walk through a Walmart toy department. It’s lined with Star Wars toys. That’s pure profit for Lucasfilm. Every t-shirt, lunchbox. And While Indiana Jones and Willow may not be available for film, they can still merchandise those properties.

    And even with the films. Paramount isn’t stupid. They are going to realize that sitting on Indiana Jones means they only profit by selling home video releases. If they work a deal with Disney, perhaps for a percentage of any future films, it is entirely possible Disney could go forward with more Indiana Jones movies.

    And as far as people getting board, I might point out that one of the most talked about movies right now is Skyfall, the new James Bond movie. The death of 007 as a film franchise has been predicted time and again and yet here we are talking about another film with big anticipation.

    I think Star Wars will be just fine.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_4Q3TSG7NIPBKBK4PMVZC5BXPIQ Joe

    Hasn’t this ship already sailed?

  • daye

    Hey I’m not saying it was good ether, I’m just saying that’s when people started to give a crap about Deadpool or at the least Marvel and his fans started to tell us we should give a crap.

  • Skot860

    wow. lofty hopes there.

  • AJ2449

    maybe.. but the first 3 Spider-Man movies have grossed about $2.6B worldwide. 

    (and if they threw in a young Han & Lando, then a $1B estimate is probably Low..) 

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/IPFXCUUJPSE542NAY5RJ4FIJSM marko

    Disney is the new Electronic Arts.

  • Ernie

    What about Cable, Stryfe, Bishop????

  • Thomas Wrobel

    Marvels probably created a lot more new things then Disney ;)
    (Disneys improved a lot recently, but come on….the whole company has always been based on classic IPs)

    $4billion was crazy cheap really for Lucas given it the studio, the IPs, the gamerights etc. 

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100000069013634 Chris Humphrey

    Nah, Fox

  • http://www.facebook.com/TopTenJesus Topten Jesus

    …Well…Marvel and Star Wars weren’t actually doing what Disney wants and is doing with them – which is make new and better movies.  Star Wars has a history of being stagnant on the big screen when there is tremendous pent up desire for more offerings.  The material is out there it’s just not being used.  Look at Warner Brothers struggling at every turn to put out a Justice League movie and look at who finally pulled the right strings to put out an amazing Avengers movie.  And besides, the biggest thing holding Star Wars back over the years has been Lucas insisting on writing and directing – get someone else behind the camera and on those scripts and we may be getting more Empire Strikes Back and less Phantom Menace, then watch it explode.

  • Gac

    Share Price motivates everything. 

  • http://www.squidoo.com/barsoom Atomic Kommie Comics

    “I’m sorry, how does John Carter fit into that?”

    He’s been around for over a century in books and comics?

  • Orphan

    Sorry Darkstream,but what’s Iconic now may not be decades from now.The response has been primarily from the merchandise and not so much from Disney successfully rebooting it’s own Iconic characters in a storytelling sense. All the success is due to Pixar and the Disney vampires claiming it as their own intellectual success.Disney is strictly marketing and the purchase of Lucasfilms is just Disney grabbing a bigger market share.It’s all about corporate control of the marketplace.Otherwise if your premise on Iconics and their long lives held true we would see Disney grabbing more PD or soon to be PD like Phantom,Shadow,Savage,Cisco Kid etc.because we know how Disney hates paying royalties to anyone.As far as live action after John Carter they’ve pretty much destroyed any interest I would have in future Star Wars films.

  • Bridgekeepers

    Totally agree . . . but I’m not sure they aren’t doing this already.  Guardians of the Galaxy?  Ant-Man?  Certainly not the “too popular to fail” projects like X-Men, Spider-Man and (now) Avengers.  It will be interesting to see what Disney will do with the Lucasfilm projects they do get – Star Wars continuing is a forgone conclusion.  It was before Disney came into the picture, just not on the big screen, with books, Clone Wars, the developing live-action TV series.  This whole things seems more like Lucasfilm was in that direction already, and George just wanted to hand it off to the company most capable of pulling off his original vision.  And when you look at the entertainment industry landscape, Disney most aptly fit the bill.

  • NeronWillRise

    I know all about his X-Men roots, but they’re just not important to his popularity. I’m simply not blind. Deadpool is popular because he’s funny and unique. He sells in the same range as FF, but he’s doing it on his own. No strong ties to any other pre-made franchise. I want you to point out any character doing the same. I’ll wait. And the idea that X-Men Origins made Deadpool popular? You must be kidding. Casual fans didn’t go pick up comics because of that movie (or any other superhero movie for that matter) and the die-hard comic fans hated it.

  • http://www.facebook.com/michaelclark1982 Michael Clark

    I would actually agree. In 2009 when Disney acquired Marvel (and my world crumbled), Disney said one thing. WE WANT THEM FOR THE MOVIES, and stuck to that, making movies every year and is poised to throw this down our throats. if you want an example of how Disney butchers a franchise, look at Power Rangers. Haim Saban when he sold it to Disney 10 years ago, was so happy and optimistic for the house of mouse to push it in a new direction, and Disney just used it to say “HEY GUYS! WE ARE NOT ALL PRINCESSES AND GIRLS!” and they lost direction and destroyed the franchise to the point Haim Saban came in and bought the franchise back, inked a deal with netflix, hulu and nickelodeon to have the shows on multiple platforms and networks. 

    sooner or later, Marvel will be sucked dry and some capitalist company will come in and purchase it, and by that time it may be too late. 

  • Audrey4

    Can I point out that Pixar is owned by Disney? So by saying that Disney should concentrate and shift their gears towards how Pixar is performing, it means the same thing as Disney should do what Disney is doing….?

  • orphan

    The whole point of my arguement on this topic is that ownership does not equate creative control and it would be interesting to see how deep into Pixar’s creative pool Disney is. Besides marketing and distribution we can only hope that as big a disaster as Disney has been creatively lately that Pixar stil develops it’s projects independently.My suspicion is that some of the unfortunate sequals may be Disney’s fault.That does not seem to be the case with Star Wars because they will have full creative control with out any buffer of creative teams that know what the heck they are doing as opposed to Disney’s cadre of illiterate bean counters.As far as future Star Wars films go I’ve already thrown in the towel.