TV, Film, and Entertainment News Daily

SDCC | Brian K. Vaughan and Cast Look to the Future of ‘Under the Dome’

Mike Vogel, Rachelle Lefevre and Dean Norris (photos courtesy of CBS)

Mike Vogel, Rachelle Lefevre and Dean Norris (photos courtesy of CBS)


The bomb that dropped on Episode 5 of Under the Dome transformed everything outside of Chester’s Mill into a wasteland, but things weren’t as nearly dire when the cast and crew of the CBS summer hit talked to the media at Comic-Con International. They even dropped a few bombs of their own, discussing long-term plans for the sci-fi thriller and the evolution of the Dome as a “sentient” character.

On hand for the first of two roundtable interviews were showrunner and executive producer Brian K. Vaughan, joined by fellow executive producers Neal Baer and Justin Falvey. They talked about the future of the series – short- and long-term – and what it’s like working with Stephen King. (Note: The interviews took place before CBS renewed Under the Dome for a second season.)

“It’s definitely the hope that we will get to do many more than this [season],” Vaughan said. “Stephen King told us, ‘When I wrote the book, I imagined it to be like these people are trapped in this dome for years, not just weeks.’ So we’ll see, if viewers stick with us, and CBS wants us to come back, we’d love to do more.”

The producers explained that whether they’re adapting elements of the story directly, or taking license with the giant-sized novel, King remains very involved in the process, reading every script and watching every cut. The author will even write the Season 2 premiere.

Falvey told his favorite moment of working with the legendary novelist.

“My favorite moment with these guys, that I was fortunate enough to be a fly on the wall – being able to hear the conversation — was they were pitching something to him, and there was a pause. It was a big idea, something that wasn’t in the book,” explained Falvey, “and there was a big pause on the other end of the line, and he came back on the line and said, ‘I wish I had come up with that.’”

Executive producers Brian K. Vaughan and Neal Baer with the stars of "Under the Dome"

Executive producers Brian K. Vaughan and Neal Baer with the stars of “Under the Dome”

“We steal as much as we can from the book,” Vaughan said. “We use a lot from each chapter, and then some of it is wholly vented. I think by the end of this first season, we’ll already have probably gone further than Stephen King did in the book – so then that’s when we’ll have to start picking Stephen’s brain, to give us more ideas for things to do.”

When asked how they plan to handle adapting the novel’s end game, and the origin of the Dome, Vaughan said, “It’s different, I think we can say. […] I love the ending of the book. It’s a really dark, sort of nihilistic ending. We talked with [King] and said, look, if we have the show on for 10 years and we get to know these characters, we can’t do that ending. That ending only works in the book. We’ll have to do something a little bit different. That means we might even have to come up with different reasons for why the Dome is here, and so that’s all been with Stephen King’s blessings.

“It’s the same characters, and more importantly the same themes that we’re trying to say,” he continued. “I think we’re trying to say the same things Stephen King was trying to say about our country, and where we’re headed.”

The mysterious origins of the Dome will start to become a little clearer before the 13th episode concludes.

“We can say by the end of the first season, you’ll start to get some answers – where this came from, and who’s behind this,” Vaughan said.

The producers said they have a potential ending for the series that Vaughan pitched King, as well as “a cache of cool things” they’re holding onto for later seasons.

Looking ahead for the rest of the summer, episodes 9,10 and 11 will see some new characters played by actresses Natalie Zea and Mayer Winningham. They said the future of Under the Dome is also dependent on the rest of the population of Chester’s Mill.

“There’s 2,932 people we haven’t met yet,” Falvey said.

Three of Chester’s Mill’s most pivotal players have been the power-hungry James “Big Jim” Rennie, the mysterious enforcer Dale “Barbie” Barbara and investigative reporter Julia Shumway, played respectively by Dean Norris, Mike Vogel and Rachelle Lefevre, who discussed their characters’ immediate futures.

Story continues below

“Big Jim just sees the Dome as his opportunity to realize his dictatorial ambitions,” Norris said of his character, who’s becomes a key power-player in the series. “A lot of people sing in the shower, I think big Jim recites Churchill speeches in the shower, and hope one day he’d get his shot.”

“I think he think he’s doing something right for the town — and at times, he does,” he added. “But at the end of the day, he’s figuring out ways to consolidate his power.”

Lefevre addressed how her character will deal with her husband’s murder. “She has her own demons to figure out and her own relationships to untangle, and as the series goes on, she gets — not all answers, but gets some answers,” she said. “And I think she has a shift in focus and I think she starts to realize that they might be in here for quite a while and that civilization matters, and starts to becoming more involved with the community as a whole, and starts to realize she’s not just a visitor in Chester’s Mill. … She’s now home for good, potentially. So she starts to get more involved with the Dome and Chester’s Mill.”

Vogel, whose “Barbie” got trapped in Chester’s Mill after murdering Julia’s husband, discussed his character’s struggle to function within the town. “That comes with navigating some difficult waters, certainly with [Julia],” the actor said. “There’s some interesting relationships and scenarios that begin to reveal themselves to with Big Jim and Junior. And I think things throughout the season, the lines get a lot more clear for where everyone stands.”

Vogel added that the action picks up and heightens as the Dome starts to take on a life of its own. ”Initially the Dome is a kind of like a device — it just seals a bunch of people in, and you think, OK, we’re going to see a bunch of people in chaos and how they react, but I think as the episodes progress, you’ll see that the Dome takes on a life of its own, and it becomes a huge part of the show.”

“My favorite moment Julia has with the Dome … is the first time she’s willing to entertain the idea that the Dome might be a sentient being,” Lefevre teased of an upcoming episode. “There’s a moment in one of the episodes where she allows that moment of doubt, of [thinking], ‘Is it possible that it is a sentient being, that it is impacting us and influencing us, and that it might be here for a purpose?’ And I really like that moment, because there’s a shift in her for the rest of the series.”

“The concept, it’s an allegorical show,” Norris said. “It’s not just what would happen if a dome actually went over your city because it is never going to happen. But as an allegory, you start to understand how people act and react to crises. And as the Dome takes on greater character, which is does, then it really becomes interesting. […] Who put it there, was it God? Is it good, is it bad? Whose side is it on, how smart is it, what are its powers, what can it do? And we start to look at that, and it makes the whole thing more complex.”

“It has this premise that it’s just so implausible, yet all the questions that the show asks are really relevant,” said Lefevre. “We ask all the basic questions in the beginning; that part of what I think is wrong with society, and humanity right now, is that we’re not asking these questions enough…How do we distribute clean water, how do we make sure everybody gets food, how do we get security, and safety, what is personal property and what is communal,” she said. “Not that the show is like a university course, but it certainly can be discourse and we hope that people will watch it and be excited, and be into it, and the characters, and then maybe turn off the TV and go, what would I do?”

Under the Dome airs Mondays at 10 a.m. on CBS.


  • DarthTigris

    The Dome is quickly becoming the Island from Lost. That’s so discouraging …

  • SeaDogBoy

    I was willing to watch it as it was presented as a summer series with a beginning, middle & end but now that it has been given a second season I feel I was bated and switched to something I didn’t sign on for. If Vaughan and the writers have been holding back ideas and using shortened story lines all along in hopes of more episodes beyond the original marketed 13, what does that tell me about how this series was going to end originally? Are they going to re-shoot any parts of the last episodes this season now that they have more time to tell more story? Regardless, I’m thinking I’m going to be very disappointed come September either way and I may not stick around and cut my losses now.

  • LightningBug

    Obviously they were angling for more seasons. No surprise there (@SeaDogBoy: did you seriously think going in that this was presented as a mini?! It was obviously supposed to be a new Lost). TV writers, and audiences have been dying for a compelling way to re-ask the question “how do we get off the island?”. As a fan of Lost, and the novel “under the dome” I felt immediately that this book presented the best possible potential for recreating what I loved about “lost”. Hopefully since Vaughn has been around the block with that series, he can learn from some of its shortcomings and play to more of its strengths. Whether they stick to the book or not, I hope they stick to an idea of a specific ending, and shoot to build toward it, rather than just teasing a mystery. First and foremost, I hope it stays about the characters. I think it sucks that they left Rusty Everett (from the book) outside of the dome, because he is a wonderful complement to Barbie, and probably the book’s best character. To me, the show hasn’t gotten the characters off of the ground quite yet, but if they do, there is a good chance that I’ll want to stick around. Lost’s greatest strength was the characters. If this show only wants to rehash the mystery, I won’t stay interested. Lost proved that mystery comes cheap, and characters win viewers. BKV: Make me love these characters.

  • Dome lover

    I’ve enjoyed “Under The Dome” however, I want it to end as a summer mini-series. Don’t drag it on as they did with “Lost”. It became tedious and I lost interest. Wouldn’t want the same thing to happen here

  • Robert

    The only thing left in common between the CBS TV series “Under the Dome” and the excellent original Stephen King novel “Under the Dome” is the imprisoning dome itself.

    You can thank the 1000 EXECUTIVE PRODUCERS of “Under the Dome” for ruining the TV series. Another fine example of way too many (network) cooks spoiling the broth. The fact that 2 of the cooks happen to be Steven Spielberg and Steven King is irrelevant; you have too many “creative” people doing damage at random. Everyone needs to see their influence on the thing, so they can feel important.

    In my opinion, there was nothing wrong with following Steven King’s book almost verbatim. But then the 1000 “cooks” would be deprived of the chance to show their “creativity”. You could always have deviated a little at the end of the story to enable the second season, or just have the same aliens cause a new crisis somewhere else, with a different dome, whatever.

    But what difference does it really make, so long as you can sell the commercial time for a helluva lot of money? When has a coherent story EVER had ANY influence on television’s profits?